Breaking news

DOJ Pushes For Google To Divest Chrome In Latest Antitrust Salvo

In a seismic shift for the tech industry, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is gearing up to request a federal court to compel Google to sell off its Chrome web browser. This dramatic move, reported by Bloomberg, marks a critical escalation in the ongoing antitrust battle against the search giant.

Chrome Divestiture: A Game-Changing Proposal

The DOJ’s recommendation to Federal Judge Amit Mehta, who previously ruled on Google’s search monopoly, aims to force the sale of Chrome – a cornerstone of Google’s multi-billion dollar advertising empire. This proposal comes after a summer 2024 ruling that found Google guilty of illegally maintaining a monopoly in the search market.

Beyond Browser Sales: Additional Measures on the Table

Justice Department officials are not stopping at Chrome’s sale. They’re also pushing for Google to license Chrome’s data and results while giving websites enhanced control over their content’s use in Google’s AI products. These measures are designed to create a more competitive digital landscape.

Chrome’s Dominance by the Numbers

Chrome’s market supremacy is stark: it commands a whopping 66.7% of the browser market share, dwarfing competitors like Safari (18%), Edge (5%), and Firefox (3%). This dominance underscores the browser’s critical role in Google’s ecosystem.

The Financial Stakes

The potential sale of Chrome could significantly impact Google’s bottom line. Last quarter alone, Google’s core advertising business, deeply intertwined with Chrome, generated $65.9 billion – a substantial portion of the company’s $88.3 billion total revenue.

A Long Road Ahead

This latest development is part of a broader antitrust saga. Judge Mehta’s August ruling found Google guilty of anti-competitive practices through exclusive distribution agreements and inflated ad pricing. As Google prepares to appeal, the court is set to consider the DOJ’s proposed changes in April 2025, with a final decision expected by August 2025.

As this legal battle unfolds, the tech world watches with bated breath, potentially reshaping the digital landscape and setting new precedents for tech industry regulation.

Cloudflare Sets New Default To Separate Search Crawlers From AI Bots

Cloudflare has drawn a sharper line between traditional search and artificial intelligence.

Beginning September 15, 2026, the company will change its default settings to block so-called mixed-use crawlers from pages that run ads, unless a site owner chooses otherwise. The policy applies to new Cloudflare customers, new sites created by existing customers, and all current free customers.

A Clearer Divide In Web Access

The shift could materially reshape how AI companies collect web data for model training and agentic products. Cloudflare’s central argument is straightforward: most publishers want their content to remain visible in search and accessible through certain AI services, but they do not want that same material repurposed without compensation.

In Cloudflare’s view, the problem is not crawling itself. It is the blending of three different functions: search, agentic use, and training into a single bot that makes it difficult for website owners to set meaningful boundaries.

The Google Question

Cloudflare pointedly referenced the “world’s largest search engine,” an unmistakable nod to Google, arguing that it has access to roughly twice as much information as rival AI companies because it makes it harder for customers to stay discoverable without also being used for AI.

Google has disputed that framing. The company offers Google Extended, a crawler setting that lets publishers opt out of having content used for training and AI products such as Gemini apps and Vertex AI, without affecting visibility in Google Search. At the same time, Googlebot still crawls for Search and for AI-powered features such as AI Overviews and AI Mode.

Publishers Want Reach, Not Exploitation

Matthew Prince, Cloudflare’s co-founder and chief executive, said the company is moving quickly because the internet is now dominated by machine traffic.

“Now that the majority of traffic on the Internet is non-human, we must go further and act faster so that a sustainable ecosystem can emerge,” Prince said, referring to the recent milestone in which bots surpassed human traffic online sooner than expected.

Prince added that Cloudflare’s tools and partnerships are designed to give publishers more visibility and commercial leverage, while also rewarding AI companies that are transparent about how they use content.

From Pay Per Crawl To Pay Per Use

Cloudflare has increasingly positioned itself as a gatekeeper for publishers looking to assert control in the AI era. The company already offers tools to block AI bots, along with a marketplace called Pay Per Crawl, which lets websites charge AI systems for scraping.

That framework is now expanding into Pay Per Use, which Cloudflare says will allow publishers to charge AI companies when content creates value, not merely when it is fetched. In practical terms, that shifts the economics from extraction to monetization.

Cloudflare says the move may also reduce waste. Its data suggests more than half of crawl traffic from AI bots is spent revisiting pages that have not changed, consuming bandwidth and compute without adding fresh value for either side.

Early Partners Signal The Commercial Model

To launch the new system, Cloudflare is working with Ceramic.ai and You.com. Under the opt-in model, publishers can be paid when their content appears in Ceramic’s AI search results or when You.com accesses premium material.

Cloudflare says other AI companies can adapt the model to fit their own products. The broader message is clear: the era of unrestricted crawling is giving way to one in which access, attribution, and compensation are increasingly negotiated rather than assumed.

Aretilaw firm
eCredo
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter