Breaking news

DOGE’s Financial Dynamics: Savings vs. Taxpayer Costs

by News Editor

April 26, 2025

As part of Elon Musk’s initiative, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) claims to have saved $160 billion by reducing wasteful government spending. However, an analysis highlights that these savings might come at a hefty price of $135 billion to taxpayers, according to a nonpartisan group.

The Financial Breakdown

The analysis by the Partnership for Public Service (PSP) points to costs from furloughing federal employees, re-hiring, and inefficiencies. They calculate this using the $270 billion federal workforce compensation, excluding legal defense costs and IRS staff reductions, potentially impacting $323 billion in future tax revenue.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Understanding the Implications

DOGE’s encouragement of early resignation has left employees benefiting from full pay without work. Mistakes in firing key roles, like bird flu experts, have led agencies to backtrack. The productivity drop due to new bureaucratic demands is another cost dimension. Max Stier of PSP commented on the stark contrast between stated goals and visible outcomes.

Broader Economic Impacts

Potential long-term impacts could touch sectors like health research, forecasting a $16 billion yearly economic downturn and loss of 68,000 jobs, echoed by academic analyses. DOGE must navigate between its ambitious $2 trillion savings target, a figure that treads on core programs like Social Security.

Despite criticism, DOGE maintains a public record of alleged savings on their “wall of receipts”, though scrutiny has questioned some claims. This context aligns with Tesla’s challenges, directly affecting Musk’s focus on DOGE.

Musk’s Role and Future Prospects

Elon Musk plans to scale back his DOGE involvement, following Tesla’s profit dip. However, he remains dedicated to reducing government waste, underpinning the president’s mission.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Call for Reform: Cyprus Faces New Challenges with Emerging Tobacco Products

by News Editor

May 31, 2025

In the face of a burgeoning variety of tobacco products, existing smoking laws in Cyprus are struggling to keep pace, as highlighted by Christos Minas, the president of the Cyprus National Addictions Authority (AAEK). On World No-Tobacco Day, there was a push for legislative reforms to comprehensively cover all tobacco forms, including non-nicotine alternatives.

Addressing Rising Trends with Effective Policies

Minas emphasized the surge in popularity of e-cigarettes and flavored products, particularly among the youth. The proposed legal updates aim to enhance enforcement efficiency against these emerging trends.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

In collaboration with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) framework, the AAEK has established the first set of national guidelines for smoking cessation in Cyprus, crafting prevention and treatment strategies based on robust scientific evidence.

Educating Youth and Public Awareness Initiatives

Efforts are underway to raise awareness, with informative materials distributed to secondary schools across Cyprus. A public event in Nicosia highlighted the state’s ongoing commitment, providing carbon monoxide testing and expert advice on new tobacco products.

Recent data from the Cyprus general population survey 2023 indicates that 38% of smokers have used e-cigarettes recently, and the smoking initiation age remains at 18.

A Glimpse into Youth Smoking Patterns

According to the latest European school survey, 14% of Cypriot students aged 15-16 reported smoking traditional cigarettes last month. Although this rate is declining, Cyprus still ranks high in Europe for e-cigarette and hookah use among students.

The concern is global, with WHO reports showing over 37 million children aged 13-15 engage in tobacco use, driven by aggressive marketing in loosely regulated environments.

The urgency for reform is clear: before these trends solidify, proactive measures are necessary to protect future generations from potentially hazardous habits.