Breaking news

Digital Transactions: A Green Approach To Finance In Cyprus

As Cyprus increasingly embraces digital transactions, the environmental benefits of this shift are becoming evident. A recent report highlights that digital payments significantly reduce the carbon footprint associated with traditional banking operations. By decreasing the reliance on physical branches, paper-based processes, and the transportation of cash, digital transactions are contributing to a more sustainable financial ecosystem. This transition is in line with global initiatives to combat climate change and underscores Cyprus’ commitment to promoting a cleaner, more efficient financial landscape.

Digital transactions are not only more convenient and efficient but also significantly less resource-intensive. Traditional banking often involves extensive paperwork, the use of physical infrastructure, and the transportation of money, all of which contribute to higher carbon emissions. In contrast, digital transactions streamline these processes, resulting in lower energy consumption and reduced waste.

The environmental advantages of digital transactions are complemented by their economic benefits. By lowering operational costs and enhancing transaction speed and security, digital payments provide a compelling case for broader adoption. This shift supports sustainable development goals and aligns with the global push towards greener, more resilient economies.

Furthermore, the widespread adoption of digital transactions in Cyprus is expected to drive innovation within the financial sector. With the integration of advanced technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence, the digital financial landscape is set to become even more efficient and secure. These innovations not only enhance user experience but also contribute to environmental sustainability by further reducing the need for physical resources.

Apple Loses €13 Billion Tax Battle Against EU: A Landmark Decision for Big Tech

In a landmark ruling, the European Court of Justice has upheld the European Union’s demand for Apple to pay €13 billion in back taxes to Ireland, marking a significant defeat for the tech giant. This decision sets a major precedent for the regulation of Big Tech companies, as it reaffirms the EU’s commitment to curbing tax avoidance by multinational corporations operating within its borders.

The case, which dates back to 2016, centres around allegations that Apple received illegal state aid from Ireland through preferential tax arrangements. The European Commission argued that these agreements allowed Apple to avoid paying its fair share of taxes on profits generated in Europe, effectively granting the company an unfair competitive advantage. The Commission initially ordered Apple to repay €13 billion, a decision the company contested in court.

Apple’s defence has always hinged on the argument that it followed the tax laws as they were written and that the profits in question were largely attributable to its operations outside of Europe. Despite this, the EU maintained that Apple’s arrangement with Ireland constituted illegal state aid, as it allowed the company to channel significant revenue through the country while paying a fraction of the taxes it would have owed in other jurisdictions.

This ruling is seen as a watershed moment in the ongoing debate around tax fairness and the role of multinational corporations in the global economy. For the European Union, the outcome reaffirms its position as a global leader in the push for corporate tax transparency and accountability. By holding Apple accountable for its tax practices, the EU is sending a clear message to other tech giants, signalling that no company, regardless of its size or influence, is above the law.

The implications of this decision are likely to reverberate throughout the tech industry, with other major corporations potentially facing increased scrutiny over their tax arrangements. In recent years, there has been growing public and governmental pressure to ensure that Big Tech companies contribute their fair share to the economies in which they operate. This ruling could catalyze further regulatory action, both within the EU and globally.

For Apple, the financial impact of the ruling is significant, but perhaps more important is the reputational damage it may suffer. As one of the world’s most valuable companies, Apple has long been in the spotlight for its tax practices, and this decision is likely to reignite debates over corporate responsibility and the ethics of tax avoidance.

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter