Digital Services Act Sparks Debate Among Cypriot MEPs: Balancing Safety And Freedom Online

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

January 24, 2025

Cypriot MEPs have highlighted the importance of the Digital Services Act (DSA) in creating a safer digital environment across the European Union. However, during a debate at the European Parliament’s plenary session in Strasbourg, they also raised concerns about potential risks to freedom of expression and unintended uses of the legislation.

DISY and EPP MEP Loucas Fourlas praised the Act as a vital step towards robust digital governance, protecting citizens from illegal content, misinformation, and online threats. However, he pointed out that differing views among EU Member States and MEPs illustrate the bloc’s fragmented external policy, which could hinder cohesive action.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Similarly, Michalis Hadjipantela, also from DISY and the EPP, welcomed the Act’s balanced approach, which aims to safeguard users from harmful content while ensuring that smaller businesses are not overburdened. He emphasized its role in fostering a transparent and secure digital ecosystem that supports competition, particularly for SMEs and startups.

From a different perspective, AKEL and Left MEP Giorgos Georgiou criticized the European Commission’s lack of action against the exploitative practices of Big Tech companies. He argued that without addressing the business models of these platforms, which thrive on extreme content, the Act cannot fully tackle hate speech and misinformation. Georgiou called for greater digital sovereignty in Europe, suggesting the development of alternative public platforms like Bluesky or Mastodon to counter Big Tech’s dominance.

DIKO and Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats MEP Costas Mavrides underscored the nuanced nature of freedom of expression, noting that it must operate within the boundaries of EU legal frameworks. He dismissed criticism of restrictions on misinformation as hypocritical, especially from those who advocate for barriers against propaganda from authoritarian regimes.

Conversely, ELAM and European Conservatives and Reformists group MEP Geadis Geadi expressed concerns that the Act risks becoming a tool for censorship, threatening the very freedoms it seeks to protect. He argued for a reassessment of its implementation to ensure users’ rights remain intact.

Independent MEP Fidias Panayiotou echoed these concerns, citing recent accusations by Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, owner of platform X, that the EU is institutionalizing censorship. Panayiotou warned against unfairly censoring posts under the guise of misinformation and proposed inviting the tech leaders to the European Parliament for discussions on content moderation practices.

The debate was notable for its high level of engagement, with around 150 MEPs participating—nearly three times the usual attendance. A pilot system was also trialed, where speakers were announced during the session rather than in advance, resulting in lively exchanges and increased interaction through blue cards and petitions.

As the Digital Services Act moves forward, the challenge will lie in striking the right balance between ensuring online safety and safeguarding fundamental freedoms, a debate that will undoubtedly shape the digital future of Europe.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

ECB Weighs Doubling Bank Reserve Requirements To Reduce Interest Costs

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

July 2, 2026

The European Central Bank is weighing a significant change to the way it manages liquidity across the euro area, with policymakers discussing a proposal to double the minimum reserves banks must hold from 1% to 2%, according to six sources cited by Reuters. If adopted, the move would reduce the ECB’s interest costs, absorb excess liquidity from the financial system and mark another step in the gradual unwinding of the extraordinary stimulus introduced over the past decade.

A Shift In The ECB’s Liquidity Strategy

Discussions are taking place as part of a broader review of the ECB’s operating framework, although the proposal has not yet been formally presented to the Governing Council. According to Reuters’ sources, deliberations remain at an early stage and a decision is unlikely before the autumn.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

For the ECB and the euro area’s national central banks, raising the reserve requirement would serve two objectives. Increasing the amount of deposits banks must hold without earning interest would reduce the Eurosystem’s interest expenses while absorbing part of the excess liquidity created through years of large-scale bond purchases. Much of that surplus liquidity remains concentrated in countries such as Germany, where central banks have incurred sizeable losses from paying interest on deposits held above the required reserve level.

Billions In Potential Savings

At the current deposit rate of 2.25%, the ECB and the euro area’s 21 national central banks are paying interest on roughly €2.16 trillion of excess liquidity, equivalent to around €48.7 billion a year, according to Reuters calculations.

Doubling mandatory reserves from their current level of €173.56 billion would reduce that annual interest bill by almost €4 billion. Pressure on central bank finances has intensified since this month’s increase in the ECB’s deposit rate from 2% to 2.25%, a move intended to contain inflationary pressures linked to the war in the Middle East that also lifted the annual cost of excess liquidity by an estimated €5.4 billion.

Why Reserve Requirements Matter Again

Minimum reserve requirements were last reduced in 2012, when the ECB cut them from 2% to 1% at the height of the eurozone sovereign debt crisis to support lending and stabilise the banking system.

More than a decade later, policymakers face a very different environment. Banks have reported record profits, liquidity remains abundant, and the financial system no longer depends on the same level of extraordinary central bank support. Against that backdrop, increasing reserve requirements has become part of a broader discussion about how quickly the ECB should normalise its balance sheet.

Implications extend well beyond the central bank itself. Persistent losses reduce the profits national central banks can distribute to governments and, in more extreme cases, may require additional public capital. Institutions such as Germany’s Bundesbank have already spread those losses over several years after the ECB’s deposit rate reached as high as 4% in 2023 while excess liquidity remained at historically elevated levels.

Part Of A Broader Normalisation Process

Beyond the immediate savings, the discussion reflects a wider reassessment of the ECB’s monetary policy framework as crisis-era support measures continue to be unwound.

An increase in reserve requirements would signal that policymakers are looking beyond inflation alone and placing greater emphasis on the long-term costs of maintaining large volumes of idle liquidity in the financial system. It would also shift a greater share of that burden back to commercial banks while giving the ECB more control over the size and cost of its balance sheet.

Breaking news