Breaking news

Digital Euro: Redefining Payment Systems in a Digital Future

Digital Euro And The Single Currency Package

The European Union is poised to embrace a transformative change in its financial ecosystem with the introduction of the digital euro. Emerging as a public-option digital payment method, the digital euro is set to complement traditional cash and private digital financial services. The Cypriot government, during its tenure as the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union, has identified the finalisation of the EU’s single currency package as a priority. With a strong focus on innovation and efficiency, EU leaders argue that the digital euro will not only catalyse a step into the digital age but also fortify the bloc’s competitive edge in global financial markets.

Technological Innovation With A Consumer Focus

The digital euro is designed to alter daily economic transactions in the euro area, impacting over 350 million citizens. Unlike cryptocurrencies, the digital euro remains a form of the euro—a new medium of payment rather than a new currency. The project is managed by the European Central Bank (ECB), which is spearheading the initiative with a focus on security, resilience, and ease of use. For consumers and businesses alike, the digital euro promises a secure, cost-effective, and accessible payment option available both online and offline.

Privacy, Security, And Seamless Usability

The proposal lays considerable emphasis on privacy and functionality. The digital euro is structured to operate like cash for the digital era; users will have the option to create a digital euro wallet via banks, post offices, or other payment service providers. This wallet can be funded through bank transfers or cash deposits, allowing transactions via mobile phones or smart cards even in low-network environments. The European Central Bank assures that while blockchain technology underpins the system, transaction details remain confidential—mirroring the privacy levels associated with cash transactions.

A Strategic Step Towards Financial Resilience

Beyond its user-friendly design, the digital euro is intended to enhance the overall resilience of the European payments ecosystem. As part of the broader digital euro package, a draft rulebook sets out unified standards and procedures, ensuring a consistent payment experience throughout the euro area. The initiative is seen as a dual achievement: preserving monetary sovereignty while encouraging a leap towards a technologically advanced, cyber-secure financial framework.

Looking Forward

If approved by the European Council and Parliament in the upcoming cycle, the European Central Bank aims to launch a pilot program as early as 2027 with a full rollout by 2029. In doing so, the digital euro is expected to coexist with cash, offering consumers a versatile choice without replacing existing forms of payment. As EU financial policies continue to evolve, the digital euro serves as a critical pivot towards a more dynamic and secure digital economy, blending tradition with digital innovation.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter