Breaking news

CySEC Coalesces With 118 Global Authorities for World Investor Week 2025

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

October 8, 2025

Global Collaboration for Investor Confidence

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has joined forces with regulators from 118 countries to champion investor protection and financial education during World Investor Week 2025. Hosted by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the event, running from October 6 to October 12, 2025, underscores the evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the associated risks within today’s digital financial landscape.

Strategic Financial Literacy Initiatives

In line with its commitment to safeguard public and investor interests, CySEC will launch a series of strategic lectures, awareness campaigns, and the release of a comprehensive Investor Guide. This guide is designed to deliver actionable advice on harnessing AI effectively for investments while elucidating critical warning signals to avoid deceptive digital products and services.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

CySEC’s initiatives extend to educational programs in schools and universities, placing an emphasis on the responsible use of digital financial tools. These efforts echo the commission’s long-established priority on financial education as a cornerstone of investor protection.

Insights From Leadership

George Theocharides, Chairperson of CySEC, emphasized the critical need for investor literacy in today’s complex market. “While financial technologies continue to offer substantial opportunities, they also introduce significant risks,” Theocharides stated. He advised prospective investors to conduct thorough independent research, avoid alluring ‘get-rich-quick’ schemes, and secure advice solely from licensed professionals.

Heightened Caution on Digital Investment Platforms

IOSCO’s campaign cautions that automated online investment tools may overlook individual financial circumstances, potentially masking underlying risks associated with cutting-edge financial technology. This message is particularly relevant as recent studies indicate that many Cypriot investors struggle to identify early fraud warning signs in the digital realm.

Engaging and Empowering Investors

To address these challenges, CySEC has introduced an interactive online quiz aimed at educating users about common pitfalls in digital investment scenarios. This tool, along with a continuous stream of educational content—spanning articles, interviews, and media appearances—highlights CySEC’s proactive approach to investor protection.

All newly produced materials, in conjunction with World Investor Week 2025, will be readily accessible through CySEC’s Financial Education Hub on its official website, reinforcing the commission’s commitment to fostering a secure and informed investment environment.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.