Breaking news

CySEC Adopts ESMA Guidelines For CASPs Under MiCA

Regulatory Update Drives Uniform Supervisory Practices

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has officially incorporated several guidelines from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) that impact crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). With this initiative, CySEC’s circular outlines detailed expectations regarding transfer services, reverse solicitation, and portfolio management activities related to crypto-assets.

Clear Directives For Transfer Services

Issued on February 26, 2025, the ESMA guidelines on transfer services are grounded in Article 82(2) of MiCA. They are designed to instill consistency and efficiency within the European financial supervision system while reinforcing a uniform approach to applying MiCA’s provisions. Furthermore, the guidelines delineate robust procedures and client rights measures intended to heighten investor protection for CASPs involved in transferring crypto-assets.

Enhanced Transparency In Reverse Solicitation

CySEC also highlighted ESMA’s guidelines on reverse solicitation, introduced on December 17, 2024. Although these guidelines primarily target competent authorities, they serve as a critical reference for both existing and prospective CASPs. The circular draws attention to specific paragraphs and illustrative examples that elucidate circumstances under which a third-country firm might be deemed to be soliciting clients within the European Union.

Standardizing Portfolio Management Requirements

The third set of guidelines, released on March 26, 2025, addresses portfolio management activities. Based on Article 81(15) of MiCA, these standards require CASPs to adhere to defined requirements regarding the suitability of crypto-asset advice and the formatting of periodic statements. This move is aimed at fostering consistent application of several MiCA provisions, thereby ensuring that supervisory practices remain effective across the board.

Implementation Timeline And Executive Endorsement

All three sets of guidelines will take effect 60 calendar days following their publication on ESMA’s website in all official EU languages. The endorsement of these measures by CySEC Chairman George Theocharides underscores the sector’s commitment to transparency, regulatory coherence, and enhanced investor protection in the rapidly evolving crypto market.

Moonshot’s Kimi K2: A Disruptive, Open-Source AI Model Redefining Coding Efficiency

Innovative Approach to Open-Source AI

In a bold move that challenges established players like OpenAI and Anthropic, Alibaba-backed startup Moonshot has unveiled its latest generative artificial intelligence model, Kimi K2. Released on a late Friday evening, this model enters the competitive AI landscape with a focus on robust coding capabilities at a fraction of the cost, setting a new benchmark for efficiency and scalability.

Cost Efficiency and Market Disruption

Kimi K2 not only offers superior performance metrics — reportedly surpassing Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 and OpenAI’s GPT-4.1 in coding tasks — but it also redefines pricing models in the industry. With fees as low as 15 cents per 1 million input tokens and $2.50 per 1 million output tokens, it stands in stark contrast to competitors who charge significantly more. This cost efficiency is expected to attract large-scale and budget-sensitive deployments, enhancing its appeal across diverse client segments.

Benchmarking Against Industry Leaders

Moonshot’s announcement on platforms such as GitHub and X emphasizes not only the competitive performance of Kimi K2 but also its commitment to the open-source model—rare among U.S. tech giants except for select initiatives by Meta and Google. Renowned analyst Wei Sun from Counterpoint highlighted its global competitiveness and open-source allure, noting that its lower token costs make it an attractive option for enterprises seeking both high performance and scalability.

Industry Implications and the Broader AI Landscape

The introduction of Kimi K2 comes at a time when Chinese alternatives in the global AI arena are garnering increased investor interest. With established players like ByteDance, Tencent, and Baidu continually innovating, Moonshot’s move underscores a significant shift in AI development—a focus on cost reduction paired with open accessibility. Moreover, as U.S. companies grapple with resource allocation and the safe deployment of open-source models, Kimi K2’s arrival signals a competitive pivot that may influence future industry standards.

Future Prospects Amidst Global AI Competition

While early feedback on Kimi K2 has been largely positive, with praise from industry insiders and tech startups alike, challenges such as model hallucinations remain a known issue in generative AI. However, the model’s robust coding capability and cost structure continue to drive industry optimism. As the market evolves, the competitive dynamics between new entrants like Moonshot and established giants like OpenAI, along with emerging competitors on both sides of the Pacific, promise to shape the future trajectory of AI innovation on a global scale.

Uri Levine Course vertical
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
SWC Finals V

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter