Cyprus’s Sustainable Development Struggles Exposed: A Critical Evaluation

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

August 26, 2025

Overview Of The Latest Findings

Recent analysis by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) places Cyprus at the bottom of the European Union’s sustainability rankings. The island secured 56th position globally among 167 countries, achieving a modest score improvement to 73.8 from 72.9 despite its continuing lag behind EU counterparts.

Structural Challenges And Policy Shortfalls

Both the latest SDSN report and the European Sustainable Development Report highlight severe structural weaknesses in Cyprus’s approach to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Critical challenges include excessive nitrogen use in agriculture, underrepresentation of women in parliament, disproportionate water consumption through imports, and a scant share of renewable energy in the national mix. These issues are further compounded by workplace safety concerns, low research and development investment, high inequality, deficient e-waste recycling, significant CO2 emissions, overfishing, limited conservation areas, and challenges related to arms exports and press freedom.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Context And Contributing Factors

Several intrinsic factors, such as the island’s divided status and its geographical vulnerability to climate-induced water scarcity, exacerbate these issues. While such conditions contribute to reduced protected wildlife areas and additional systemic hurdles, they are not insurmountable. Experts argue that enhanced national policies, stricter institutional coordination, and robust civil society engagement could meaningfully address many of these shortfalls.

Progress Amid Concerns

Despite the setbacks, there have been notable improvements in sectors such as poverty reduction, quality education, and efforts to mitigate inequality. Collaborative initiatives led by SDSN Cyprus, in partnership with government bodies, businesses, and community groups, have fostered sustainability education and encouraged the active involvement of youth, thereby laying the groundwork for more substantial policy reform and operational integration of the SDGs.

Looking Ahead

Future strategies should prioritize climate action, responsible consumption, and marine conservation while also addressing areas like tax transparency and development aid. A recalibrated approach that unites policy reform with multi-sector collaboration is key to transforming Cyprus’s sustainable development landscape. This coordinated effort is essential not only to overcome current vulnerabilities but also to ensure long-term, resilient growth.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news