Cyprus Surpasses EU Average In Digital Banking Adoption

The latest data from Eurostat’s Digitalisation in Europe 2025 report underscores a decisive shift in consumer banking habits. Cyprus now leads the European Union with 85.1 percent of internet users managing their finances online in 2024, a significant rise from 77.7 percent in 2023 and 71.4 percent in 2022. Meanwhile, the EU average reached 72.4 percent in 2024, climbing steadily from 56 percent in 2014.

Regional And Demographic Insights

Across the EU, online banking is most widely embraced by individuals aged 25 to 64, where 76 percent engage in digital transactions. Younger internet users aged 16 to 24 demonstrated a 66 percent adoption rate, and even among the 65 to 74 age group, 59 percent have moved to online banking. A closer look at the data reveals that Denmark leads with 98 percent usage, closely followed by Finland and the Netherlands at 97 percent each, and Latvia at 91 percent. In contrast, Romania and Bulgaria trail significantly at 17 percent and 20 percent respectively.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Bank Of Cyprus: Driving The Digital Transformation

In Cyprus, the transformation is further evidenced by robust performance at the Bank of Cyprus (BoC). Recent figures show that digital transactions accounted for 96.6 percent of all banking activity in March 2025, up from 86.2 percent in March 2021. The BoC Mobile app continues to gain momentum, with active users rising to 451,012 in March 2025 from 420,087 the previous year. During this period of rapid digital adoption, George Tziortzis, the director of IT and digital transformation at the Bank of Cyprus, affirmed the bank’s commitment to leveraging digital channels to enhance customer experience and operational security while also addressing challenges of customer education regarding new digital interfaces.

Implications For The Broader Banking Landscape

Analysts believe that the accelerated shift to online banking will enable financial institutions to reduce costs and heighten security protocols. However, as banks continue to advance their digital offerings, gaps in internet literacy remain a concern. Regions with lower digital engagement risk falling further behind as the landscape evolves. This trend underscores the need for a balanced approach that ensures both technological progress and inclusivity in access to digital services.

As evidenced in Cyprus and other leading EU markets, the trend toward digital banking is not just a temporary shift but a fundamental transformation in how financial services are delivered and consumed across Europe.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news