Breaking news

Cyprus Shipping Industry Champions Global Initiative For Harassment-Free Seas

Maritime Sector Takes a Stand

Cyprus’s shipping community is increasingly aligning itself with international efforts to eradicate harassment at sea. As part of a broader commitment to crew welfare and respectful workplace culture, local maritime stakeholders are integrating global campaigns and regulatory reforms into their operational framework.

Global Campaign for a Harassment-Free Workplace

In mid-2025, the International Maritime Organization (IMO)’s Day of the Seafarer campaign, under the banner “My Harassment-Free Ship,” resonated deeply within Cyprus’ maritime sector. This initiative called on shipping companies, regulators, and crew members to translate well-intentioned pledges into tangible safeguards such as robust training programs, protection measures, and reliable reporting mechanisms.

Enhancing Safety Through a Culture of Respect

Local maritime leaders have linked a respectful onboard culture to improved safety outcomes and operational efficiency. Earlier this year, executives from the Columbia Group emphasized that an open, inclusive culture is crucial for optimal communication, safer operations, and overall crew well-being. This sentiment was further reinforced at the 2025 Maritime Cyprus Conference in Limassol, where IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez highlighted crew welfare, mental health, and safety culture as vital pillars alongside decarbonisation and digitalisation.

Regulatory Evolution and Industry Response

Regulatory changes are accelerating this paradigm shift. From 2026, amendments to the IMO’s STCW Code will mandate training that specifically targets the prevention of harassment and bullying, including sexual harassment. Concurrently, Cyprus has introduced a national Code of Practice on workplace conduct that supports a zero-tolerance policy across all sectors, including shoreside maritime operations.

Innovative Training Addresses a Critical Gap

Steve Richards, Director at VIRSEC, notes that traditional corporate training does not adequately reflect the complexities of life at sea. In response, his team is preparing a fully online course, set to launch in early 2026, that addresses the unique challenges of maritime operations. This curriculum uses realistic scenarios to tackle issues from harassment to miscommunication, ensuring that crew members—from seafarers to supervisors—are better equipped to navigate the onboard environment.

The Business Case for a Respectful Maritme Culture

Richards explains that the maritime industry faces significant recruitment and retention challenges, particularly as it seeks to attract a diverse workforce that includes more women and younger professionals. For the industry, fostering trust and ensuring that crew members feel safe is not only a matter of legal compliance but also of competitive advantage. Empirical evidence shows that respected teams communicate more effectively, experience fewer conflicts, and perform better during both routine and emergency operations.

A Future Focused on Inclusivity and Safety

Looking ahead, industry leaders are committed to transforming maritime workplace culture. With advances in technology, rapid shipping expansion, and evolving crew demographics, now is the time to redefine professional standards. As Richards wisely observes, harassment undermines not only morale and trust but also operational safety. Investing in tailored, scenario-based training is key to cultivating a culture where every maritime professional is empowered to maintain high levels of professionalism, safety, and inclusivity.

For companies dedicated to establishing a healthier and more respectful maritime environment, this strategic shift is as essential as any technical upgrade. The path toward safer seas begins with creating a workplace where every crew member is valued, heard, and protected.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter