Breaking news

Cyprus Shipping Chamber Champions Global Net-Zero Framework

Global Maritime Leaders Unite

The Cyprus Shipping Chamber (CSC) has voiced strong support for a joint statement by seven premier international maritime organizations urging governments to adopt a unified Net-Zero Framework (NZF). This proposal is poised for debate at the upcoming Extraordinary Session of the International Maritime Organisation’s Marine Environment Protection Committee, scheduled for October 14-17, 2025.

A Call For Industry-Wide Transformation

The joint statement, endorsed by influential bodies including the International Chamber of Shipping, the European Community Shipowners’ Associations, the Asian Shipowners’ Association, the International Association of Ports and Harbors, the International Bunker Industry Association, the International Transport Workers’ Federation, and the World Shipping Council, advocates for a comprehensive global framework. This initiative is aimed at catalyzing the shipping industry’s transition to zero emissions, ensuring consistency across borders and preventing a patchwork of unilateral regulations that could spur rising costs without delivering substantive environmental benefits.

Ensuring A Level Playing Field

Recognizing that shipping is responsible for the transit of approximately 90 percent of global trade, industry experts emphasize that only a worldwide regulatory standard can effectively decarbonise such an expansive and international sector. The Cyprus Shipping Chamber stresses that governmental support under a single global framework will not only accelerate the shift to zero emissions but also provide a level playing field for all industry stakeholders.

A Historic Opportunity For Sustainable Change

The joint statement underscores this initiative as a unique opportunity for governments to introduce a comprehensive regulatory structure. Such a framework would incentivize green investments, support a just transition for seafarers, and enforce compliance worldwide, thereby de-risking investments in emerging fuels and technologies. This approach is designed to make the ambitious goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 both realistic and inclusive.

Adapting To A Rapidly Changing Landscape

At the recent Maritime Cyprus 2025 conference, the CSC hosted a panel discussion titled ‘Protecting Shipowners In A Rapidly Changing Environment.’ The dialogue, featuring industry leaders from Columbia Group, Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement, InterMaritime Shipmanagement, and Marlow Navigation, tackled critical issues such as decarbonisation, digitalisation, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) compliance, and geopolitical uncertainties. The discussion highlighted the evolving role of ship management companies as strategic partners, essential for safeguarding fleets, ensuring crew welfare, and enhancing operational resilience.

Conclusion

The Cyprus Shipping Chamber’s endorsement of the NZF is indicative of a profound commitment to sustainable maritime transformation. By advocating for a unified, global framework, the industry is poised to not only meet ecological imperatives but also secure a competitive and equitable future in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter