Breaking news

Cyprus Sees Steady Residential Price Growth Amid EU Market Fluctuations

Market Snapshot: Cyprus and the European Union

Recent Eurostat data reveal that Cyprus experienced a 2 percent annual increase in house prices in the first quarter of 2025. This uptick is part of a broader European trend where property prices across the EU rose 5.7 percent year-over-year and 1.4 percent compared to the previous quarter. Concurrently, rising rents—up 3.2 percent annually and 0.9 percent quarterly—continue to place additional pressure on household budgets in numerous member states.

Regional Leaders and Laggers

Among EU countries, Portugal led with an impressive 16.3 percent annual increase in housing prices, followed closely by Bulgaria (15.1 percent), Croatia (13.1 percent), Spain (12.3 percent), Slovakia (12.2 percent), and the Netherlands (10.7 percent). In contrast, Finland was the sole country to report a decrease, with house prices falling by 1.9 percent.

Quarterly comparisons further underscore market divergence: Cyprus recorded a 1.1 percent rise, while Hungary posted the most dynamic growth across the bloc at 5.2 percent, trailed by Portugal at 4.8 percent and Croatia at 4.5 percent. Notably, Slovenia, Luxembourg, and Finland experienced declines, with Slovenia seeing the most significant drop at 2 percent.

Long-Term Trends and Transaction Activity

Since 2010, EU house prices have surged by 57.9 percent, contrasting with a 27.8 percent increase in rents. While historical data shows that property prices in at least 24 EU member states have consistently outpaced inflation from 2016 to 2021, the subsequent years of 2022 and 2023 saw higher inflation exerting downward pressure on real house prices—declining by 7 percent in 2023 and an additional 0.5 percent in 2024.

Despite these challenging markets, housing transactions witnessed a robust rebound in 2023. Sales increased in 13 of the 17 EU countries with available data, marking the first annual rise since 2021. Cyprus, in particular, stood out with a 31 percent increase in sales, while Luxembourg experienced the steepest rise at 47.1 percent, followed by Hungary at 34.7 percent and the Netherlands at 16.7 percent.

Rent Dynamics and Regional Variations

The past 15 years have seen Estonia, Lithuania, and Hungary register the highest rent increases. In stark contrast, Greece remains the only country where rental prices have yet to rebound to pre-2010 levels, despite recent sharp increases. These divergent trends highlight the complexity and regional nuances that investors and policymakers must navigate in today’s dynamic real estate market.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter