Breaking news

Cyprus Pushes For Visa Waiver Deal By September As U.S. Experts Complete Security Review

Cyprus is accelerating efforts to join the U.S. Visa Waiver Program (VWP), aiming to seal the deal before September. American officials are in the country this week, conducting on-site security assessments—a key step in the approval process.

The VWP allows citizens from approved countries to enter the U.S. for tourism or business without a visa for up to 90 days. Cyprus, currently not on the list, has been working to meet the strict entry requirements, especially around security standards and visa rejection rates.

U.S. experts arrived on Monday and have already carried out inspections at critical infrastructure points including airports, ports, the Ministry of Interior, the Deputy Ministry of Immigration, and police facilities. According to sources close to the Cypriot Presidency, the visit focuses on evaluating how the country handles border security, identity verification, and overall system integrity.

Additional questions from the American side may follow once the site visits conclude. The outcome hinges on a report the U.S. government will submit to Congress. If the findings are favorable, Cyprus could get the green light.

Even with a positive recommendation, inclusion isn’t immediate. It takes two to three months to update U.S. systems before Cypriot travelers can use the streamlined electronic travel process.

Timing is crucial. While there’s no formal deadline, Cyprus is aiming for September to lock in this year’s impressively low visa rejection rate—a core eligibility requirement. To qualify, a country’s refusal rate for U.S. visas must stay below 3% over 12 months ending in September.

Cyprus currently sits comfortably at 2.16%, the third lowest globally, according to the U.S. State Department. Only the United Arab Emirates (1.46%) scored better among active applicants. Some nations, including Liechtenstein and Monaco, showed 0% rejections—but this may reflect no applications rather than flawless approval rates.

On the other end of the spectrum, countries like Laos (82.84%), Liberia (79.38%), and Somalia (77.02%) recorded the highest visa refusal rates.

If Cyprus secures a spot in the VWP, it would mark a major win for both its government and citizens, who would benefit from easier travel to the United States. The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether that long-anticipated milestone is finally within reach.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter