Breaking news

Cyprus Parliament Reviews National Loss Fund Amid Asset Reforms

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 19, 2026

National Loss Fund And Confiscated Assets

In its recent session, the Parliamentary Committee on Refugees revisited the law proposal aimed at securing the National Loss Fund for the Use of Confiscated Assets. A representative from the Ministry of Finance affirmed that the accompanying regulations are under preparation and will be submitted once finalized, while also voicing opposition to the creation of an independent agency.

Legislative Proposals And Fiscal Perspectives

Originally introduced by DISY in September, the law is supported by two amendments tabled by AKEL and anticipates the incorporation of forthcoming regulations from the Ministry of Interior into legislation governing the Central Agency For Equitable Resource Distribution. Committee member Nikos Kettseros emphasized that with funding of €20 million, roughly four in ten confiscated property owners would receive about €2 per month, a figure that remains modest even under a €100 million scenario. The proposed amendments include reallocating unassigned funds from the Agency into a dedicated loss-of-use fund to bolster financial support.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Housing Loan Subsidies And Transition Measures

Additional amendments under discussion involve the subsidization of housing loans at a 0% rate and the establishment of a six‐month transitional period starting January 1, 2027, to integrate older loans into the governing framework. The Ministry of Interior has stated that the regulations will focus on land valuation, clarifying that those who have sought refuge in the committee regarding confiscated assets will not be entitled to compensation. These measures indicate that the fund could operate effectively under the existing structure without necessitating a separate independent body. DISY legislator George Karoulas has advocated for a legally entrenched national fund with sustainable financing, while also expressing concerns about potential delays in finalizing the regulations.

KtiZó Initiative And Housing Regulations

The session also addressed the KtiZó initiative, designed to provide grants for existing multi-family buildings in government housing projects. Senior official Eirini Giannakou from the Department of Urban Planning and Housing announced the completion of a new guide spanning approximately 500 pages, which clearly defines procedures and responsibilities. Despite this progress, stakeholders noted ongoing challenges related to beneficiary contributions and property ownership classifications. Giannis Sofokleous, a senior official from the Ministry of Interior, confirmed that the guidelines are currently under review and will undergo legal scrutiny, with the expectation that minimal further revisions will be required thereafter.

Property Issues In The Industrial Zone

The committee also examined property disputes and delayed contracts affecting displaced residents in the Pane Polemidion Industrial Zone. The committee chair announced that a formal letter will be dispatched to the Minister of Interior, with the matter slated for further discussion on March 17. Local officials from the Municipality of Kato Polemidion and representatives of refugee organizations raised issues regarding access, parking, and property rights, calling for immediate remedial action.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.