Breaking news

Cyprus Outlines Strategic Digital Priorities Ahead Of EU Council Presidency

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

December 9, 2025

At the Telecommunications Council in Brussels, Cyprus set forth its digital and technological agenda for its upcoming EU Council Presidency. Deputy Minister Nicodemos Damianou, representing Cyprus in the domains of research, innovation, and digital policy, positioned the nation as a forward-thinking champion of regulatory reform and technological advancement.

Strengthening Europe’s Competitive Edge

European ministers convened to deliberate on critical issues including digital competitiveness, the simplification of legislative frameworks, and the accelerated implementation of the Digital Services Act. The Council Conclusions adopted during the session emphasize a coordinated, streamlined approach to regulation—one that promises to spur the faster adoption of innovative technologies while bolstering Europe’s capacity to compete globally.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Addressing Technological And Geopolitical Pressures

During the discussions, Damianou stressed the political significance of digital simplification and effective digitalization. He argued that by reducing bureaucratic burdens and harmonizing rules, Europe can create an environment that not only fosters innovation but also fortifies its economy and delivers tangible benefits to its citizens. His remarks underscored the dual challenges of rapid technological change and escalating geopolitical pressures that all member states currently face.

Three Pillars Of The Cyprus Presidency

The Cyprus Presidency’s work programme in telecommunications is structured around three strategic pillars. The first aims to reinforce Europe’s digital capabilities and technological leadership. The second pillar is committed to improving cyber resilience and safeguarding the digital ecosystem, including enhanced protection for minors online. The third pillar focuses on deepening strategic partnerships within the digital sphere, with Damianou clarifying that digital sovereignty should be synonymous with collaboration rather than isolation.

Forging Alliances For A Digital Future

In the run-up to its presidency, Cyprus engaged with senior counterparts from Germany, Poland, France, and Italy, including prominent figures such as Karsten Wildberger, Dariusz Standerski, Anne Le Hénanff, and Valentino Valentini. These high-level discussions on digital cooperation signal a concerted effort to align diverse national strategies toward a unified and robust European digital vision.

As Europe navigates the complexities of the Digital Decade, Cyprus’s proactive agenda underscores the imperative for regulatory reform, digital empowerment, and strategic collaboration. This approach is designed to foster an ecosystem that accelerates innovation and secures sustained prosperity for European citizens and businesses alike.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.