Breaking news

Cyprus Offers Strategic Tax Incentives To Attract Global Talent

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

January 21, 2026

Overview Of The Minds In Cyprus Initiative

Cyprus is making headway in its efforts to attract skilled professionals from abroad, launching a revamped tax incentive scheme under the initiative known as Minds in Cyprus. The program is designed to ease the transition for overseas workers into the local workforce by offering significant tax exemptions and broad eligibility criteria, particularly for those who have resided outside the country for seven years.

Program Details And Fiscal Implications

According to reports from the Ministry of Finance, around 600 overseas professionals have already expressed interest in leveraging the new benefits. Under the current framework, employment earnings can enjoy a tax relief of 20% up to €8,550 for a period of seven years. However, the proposed legislative amendment aims to increase this exemption to 25% for self-employed earnings, extending the maximum relief up to €25,000 for those who have lived abroad for the specified period.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Eligibility Criteria And Comparative Markets

The initiative targets young professionals and introduces variable residency requirements based on educational qualifications. Applicants holding a recognized university degree are required to have spent three years abroad, while those without such credentials must meet a seven-year residency condition. Notably, similar schemes are also being implemented in Greece, reflecting a broader regional trend in fiscal policy aimed at talent retention and attraction.

Stakeholder Concerns And Future Considerations

Despite the positive outlook, some members of the Economic Committee have raised concerns about potential inequalities. Critics argue that the policy may result in a disparity between different groups of workers, effectively creating two tiers of employment. There is a strong call for setting an expiration date for the initiative to ensure its relevance and fairness over time.

Legal Perspectives And Implementation Insights

Representatives from the Cyprus Bar Association, including legal expert Maria Grigoriou, have also voiced concerns. Grigoriou highlighted that the retroactive application of the new provisions, effective from January 1, 2025, might benefit workers who relocated in the previous year. Furthermore, she emphasized the need to align an applicant’s professional experience with the nature of the work in Cyprus to ensure that the scheme truly serves the country’s interests.

Balancing Incentives And Fairness

An official from the Cyprus Employers and Industrialists Federation (OEB) noted that while the tax incentive adds a valuable dimension to Cyprus’s economic strategy, the inherent challenge remains: balancing fairness across all sectors. The official acknowledged that criteria which favor some groups might inadvertently exclude others, underscoring the complexity of designing universally equitable fiscal incentives.

As the scheme continues to evolve, both policymakers and industry stakeholders will be closely monitoring its effectiveness and impact on Cyprus’s competitive edge in attracting global talent.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.