Breaking news

Cyprus Inflation Climbs As Oil And Food Prices Jump In March 2026

Overview Of March Price Trends

Price pressures intensified in Cyprus in March 2026, driven by increases in oil-related and agricultural products. Data from the Observatory of Basic Consumer Goods show food inflation rising to 3.8%, up from 2.7% in the previous month. The increase reflects broader geopolitical pressures, including developments in the Middle East that continue to affect supply chains and input costs.

Key Inflation Metrics

Oil products recorded a monthly increase of 9.1%, while agricultural goods rose by 6.1%. On an annual basis, agricultural products increased by 13.3%, followed by services at 2.5% and oil products at 2.3%. Electricity and water prices, in contrast, declined by 13% over the same period. Data were collected from daily pricing across 400 retail outlets in Cyprus, covering 250 essential goods. Price increases were recorded in 33 categories, while 12 categories showed declines.

Among the strongest monthly increases were:

  • Frozen fish: +13.9%
  • Processed meats: +10.1%
  • Evaporated and sweetened milk: +8.1%
  • Pre-grilled frozen fish: +7.8%
  • Juices: +7.3%
  • Canned meats: +7.1%

Additional upward pressure was observed in bottled water, gas cylinders, frozen burgers, soft drinks, fresh vegetables, oils, and frozen pasta products.

Price declines were recorded in:

  • Canned fish: -12.8%
  • Fresh fish and seafood: -11.0%
  • Rice: -9.0%
  • Cheeses: -3.3%
  • Pulses: -2.9%

Smaller decreases were noted in bread, tissues, toilet paper, and biscuits.

Detailed Category Changes

Monthly increases continued to reflect strong volatility in food categories. Frozen fish rose by 13.9% month-on-month and by 21.7% compared to March 2025. Processed meats increased by 10.1% monthly and 9.5% annually, while juices recorded a 7.3% monthly rise and 11.1% year-on-year growth. Fresh vegetables and greens increased by 4.6% in March, but showed a sharper 22.6% annual rise, indicating sustained pressure on fresh produce. At the same time, several categories showed continued declines. Fresh fish and seafood dropped by 11.0% in March after rising 3.7% a year earlier, while rice fell by 9.0%, extending its downward trend.

E-Kalathi And Consumer Insights

Data from the Consumer Protection Service confirm a gradual rise in overall inflation, which reached 1.2% in March 2026, up from 0.1% in February and 0.5% in January. The e-Kalathi platform shows that, as of April 15, 2026, the price gap for a basket of 257 essential items narrowed to €122.42 from €131.61 in the previous month. Among major retailers, “Filippos” recorded a total basket cost of €1,136.26, while “Athiniotis” offered the lowest price at €1,013.84. Consumers are encouraged to use the e-Kalathi platform and mobile application to compare prices and manage household spending more effectively.

 

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter