Cyprus Implements EU-Mandated 15% Tax Rate On Large Multinationals

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

August 27, 2024

Cyprus is set to introduce a 15% minimum tax rate for large multinational corporations, in compliance with the EU directive aimed at harmonising tax policies across member states. The move, endorsed by Cyprus’ Finance Minister Makis Keravnos, is expected to generate over €200 million in additional revenue. This decision, while marking a significant shift from the current 12.5% rate, aligns Cyprus with the broader OECD-led initiative to establish a global minimum tax rate. Despite concerns, Keravnos reassured that the change is unlikely to drive multinationals out of the country, as the directive applies EU-wide.

This adjustment reflects a crucial step in Cyprus’ ongoing efforts to maintain competitiveness while adhering to international tax standards. With the proposal now before the Cabinet and soon to be discussed in Parliament, the nation is poised to balance its attractive tax regime with the demands of a globalised economy.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

The introduction of this tax rate signals Cyprus’ commitment to international cooperation on tax matters, aiming to prevent profit-shifting practices that have historically allowed large corporations to minimise tax liabilities. For Cyprus, a key hub for multinational firms, this move could redefine its positioning in the global business landscape, ensuring it remains a compliant yet competitive destination for international business.

While the increase may seem minor, the 15% rate represents a broader shift in global tax policy, driven by a collective effort to create a more level playing field for taxation. For Cyprus, traditionally seen as a tax-friendly jurisdiction, this could challenge its status, pushing it to leverage other competitive advantages beyond low tax rates, such as a robust legal framework, strategic location, and skilled workforce. The long-term impact on foreign direct investment will be a critical metric to watch as this policy unfolds.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news