Cyprus Hosts UN’s New Space Office To Boost Disaster Response In The Eastern Mediterranean

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 20, 2025

Cyprus is making a significant leap onto the global stage in disaster management with the launch of a new space-based initiative. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) and the ERATOSTHENES Centre of Excellence paves the way for the creation of a Regional Support Office (RSO) for the UN’s UN-SPIDER program, aimed at harnessing satellite technology to tackle disasters in the Eastern Mediterranean and beyond.

This strategic partnership will strengthen regional and global efforts to use space-based tools for disaster management and risk reduction. The ERATOSTHENES CoE, known for its cutting-edge research in satellite and airborne remote sensing, will host the new RSO, bringing its advanced expertise to the UN-SPIDER network.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

The new office will focus on offering technical advisory support, capacity-building in space technology, and sharing knowledge from Earth Observation data to mitigate the impact of disasters. The RSO will also play a key role in providing real-time assistance during emergencies, ranging from earthquakes and forest fires to floods and coastal erosion.

Dr. Marios Tzouvaras, Research Coordinator at ERATOSTHENES CoE, highlighted the importance of the initiative, noting that the center’s extensive research in satellite imagery and data analysis will play a crucial role in disaster risk reduction. “Our collaboration with UNOOSA will allow us to apply our long-term scientific knowledge to real-world challenges, not just for Cyprus but for the entire region,” Tzouvaras said.

With the agreement set to begin in February 2025, Cyprus is poised to become a central node in UNOOSA’s mission to bring space-based disaster response solutions to the global community. This partnership marks a crucial step in the evolution of disaster management, leveraging the power of space to save lives and reduce risks across multiple regions.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news