Breaking news

Cyprus Government Posts Strong Fiscal Metrics Amid Revenue and Expenditure Shifts

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

The Cyprus government has reported a robust fiscal performance for the January–October 2025 period, posting a surplus of €1.119 billion, equivalent to 3.1 percent of GDP. This figure, released by the Statistical Service (Cystat), reflects a slight contraction from the €1.3209 billion surplus, or 3.8 percent of GDP, recorded during the same timeframe in 2024.

Revenue Growth Anchored by Diversified Sources

Total government revenue climbed to €12.33 billion, marking an increase of €658.5 million (5.6 percent) compared to last year’s €11.67 billion. This surge was underpinned by notable gains across several revenue streams. Income and wealth taxes rose by €154.6 million (5.3 percent) to €3.05 billion, while social contributions experienced an 8.2 percent increase, adding €296.3 million to reach €3.91 billion.

Property income delivered an impressive 40.1 percent boost, rising by €38.2 million to €133.5 million. In contrast, taxes on production and imports incrementally increased by 0.2 percent, reaching €3.95 billion, despite a modest decline in net VAT revenue of €24.8 million (0.9 percent) to €2.65 billion.

Additional growth was observed in the sale of goods and services, which surged by €137.4 million (18.7 percent) to €871.3 million, while capital transfers surged by an impressive 64.9 percent, adding €46.2 million to total €117.4 million. However, current transfers receded by 6.7 percent, falling by €21.9 million to €304.6 million.

Escalating Expenditures Reflect Strategic Investments

Expenditure for the period climbed to €11.21 billion, an increase of €860.4 million (8.3 percent) from €10.35 billion recorded in the same period in 2024. Key spending categories registered notable changes. Compensation of employees increased by €201 million (6.7 percent) to €3.20 billion, with social benefits rising by €299.7 million (7.1 percent) to €4.53 billion.

Intermediate consumption grew by €72.5 million (6.6 percent) to €1.18 billion, while interest payments remained stable at €358.7 million. Conversely, subsidies and current transfers contracted, with decreases of €10.7 million (8.3 percent) to €118.5 million and €10.4 million (1.6 percent) to €658.4 million, respectively.

Importantly, the capital account saw a substantive increase of €307.8 million (36 percent) to reach €1.16 billion, driven by a 12.3 percent growth in gross capital formation, totaling €822.3 million, and a doubling of other capital expenditure to €341.5 million. It is worth noting that, for several entities within the general government — particularly the local government subsector — estimates were applied due to incomplete data submissions.

This fiscal report underscores the government’s balanced approach to revenue enhancement and strategic expenditure, reflecting not only immediate gains but also a commitment to longer-term capital investments. Such measures provide a nuanced view into the evolving financial landscape of Cyprus, as policymakers navigate the interplay between revenue sources and fiscal outlays.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter