Cyprus Faces One Of Europe’s Widest Gaps In Home Energy Efficiency Upgrades

Cyprus has emerged as one of the European Union’s clearest examples of how the benefits of the energy transition are not being shared evenly.

A Wider Divide Than Most Of Europe

New Eurostat data show that 30.3% of Cypriots not at risk of poverty or social exclusion lived in homes that had undergone energy efficiency improvements during the previous five years. Among those at risk of poverty or social exclusion, the figure dropped to 16.7%.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

The resulting gap of 13.6 percentage points ranks among the three widest in the EU.

Only the Netherlands recorded a larger disparity, with 63.3% of people not at risk of poverty living in upgraded homes compared with 45.3% of those at risk, a difference of 18 percentage points. Denmark followed with a gap of 13.5 percentage points, as 36.4% of higher-income households had benefited from energy efficiency improvements versus 22.9% of vulnerable households.

The EU Picture Still Favors Better-Off Households

Across the EU, 23.9% of people lived in homes that had undergone energy efficiency improvements over the previous five years.

The overall figure, however, masks a persistent inequality. Only 17.4% of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion lived in upgraded homes, compared with 25.6% of those not at risk.

For lower-income households, access to improvements such as better insulation, more efficient heating systems and upgraded windows can significantly reduce energy bills while improving resilience to future price increases.

Netherlands Leads, Italy Trails

The Netherlands recorded the highest overall share of residents living in energy-efficient homes, at 60.5%, followed by Denmark at 34.0%. France and Slovenia shared third place, with 33.3% each.

Italy ranked last at just 2.6%, followed by Malta at 7.8% and Greece at 9.5%.

A Challenge For Europe’s Green Transition

The figures suggest that while energy efficiency upgrades are becoming more common across Europe, access remains uneven both between and within member states.

For policymakers, the challenge extends beyond improving buildings. Ensuring that lower-income households can benefit from the energy transition will be essential if Europe wants to reduce both emissions and energy poverty at the same time.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Cyprus Crypto Users Face New Risks As MiCA Rules Take Effect

by News Editor

August 18, 2026

Why Investors Need To Check The Company Behind Their Crypto Platform

Crypto users in Cyprus are being urged to verify exactly which company holds their assets after the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) transition period ended on July 1, 2026.

MiCA rules for crypto-asset service providers have applied since December 2024, but Cyprus allowed companies operating under its previous national framework to continue temporarily. CySEC required providers wishing to remain in the market to apply by February 27, 2026.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

The end of the transition means that appearing on an old national register is no longer enough. Investors must check the specific legal entity providing the service and the activities it is authorised to perform.

Two Regulatory Routes

CySEC maintains separate registers for providers authorised under Article 63 and companies using the Article 60 notification route.

The lists should not simply be treated as a count of licensed crypto exchanges. Providers have different regulatory statuses and may be authorised for different services, including custody, transfers, exchanges or operating trading platforms.

Companies authorised elsewhere in the EU can also serve Cypriot customers through MiCA passporting. Investors should therefore check the wider ESMA register.

Familiar Brands Can Still Be Used In Scams

MiCA authorisation applies to a specific legal entity, not automatically to every website, subsidiary or service using the same brand. Fraudsters can copy a legitimate company’s name, logo and licence number while changing its website or payment details.

The regulatory transition creates another opportunity for scammers. They can imitate legitimate notices about account closures or transfers and claim that customers must urgently move their assets to a new “regulated” platform.

In its July announcement, CySEC warned that customers using unauthorised providers do not receive MiCA protections and advised investors to verify providers through ESMA.

A Wider European Shake-Up

The changes affect the broader European crypto market. VASPnet estimated that more than 1,700 unlicensed crypto companies could face closure, relocation or restructuring after the transition period.

ESMA’s register contained 323 authorised providers at the end of July, while TRM Labs identified 1,343 operating providers in the European Economic Area on July 1, including 281 with MiCA authorisation. The different figures reflect different methodologies, but point to a substantial number of providers operating without the new authorisation.

ESMA instructed unauthorised companies to stop accepting new EU customers, opening accounts and marketing their services, while allowing limited activity needed for an orderly withdrawal.

What Investors Should Check

MiCA introduces common requirements for areas such as governance, disclosures and safeguarding client assets, but it does not make crypto investments risk-free.

For Cyprus users, the key questions are which legal entity provides the service, what it is authorised to do and whether the website or contact details are genuine.

Requests to transfer assets urgently, pay recovery fees, reveal private keys or install remote-access software should be treated as red flags. MiCA may bring greater clarity to the market, but the transition has also created a new opportunity for criminals to exploit a very real regulatory change.

Breaking news