Breaking news

Cyprus Faces Higher Energy Risks As Iran Conflict Disrupts Oil Markets

Introduction

The conflict involving Iran has increased pressure on global energy markets and raised concerns about oil supply routes in the Middle East. Cyprus, which relies heavily on imported oil for electricity generation and transport, could face higher energy costs if supply disruptions intensify. Andreas Poullikkas, professor of energy systems at Frederick University and former chairman of the Cyprus Energy Regulatory Authority, provided an analysis of potential developments.

Global Energy Market Disruptions

According to Poullikkas, military strikes on Iranian nuclear and energy facilities by the United States and Israel have already affected energy market sentiment. Iran also controls the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime route through which about 20% of global oil shipments pass.

Any disruption in this corridor could influence global supply flows. Iranian countermeasures, including attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure, have reportedly reduced oil production by about two million barrels per day.

Market Reactions And Sectoral Impacts

Energy markets have responded with increased price volatility. Brent crude oil recently traded at around $81.40 per barrel. Rising fuel costs have supported energy-sector stocks, while airlines face higher operating expenses. Disruptions affecting liquefied natural gas shipments from Qatar and delays along Red Sea shipping routes have also contributed to higher gas prices in Europe, which have increased by about 15%. Analysts at Goldman Sachs note that the situation is testing the resilience of Europe’s energy system and storage capacity.

Scenario Analysis: Forecasting Impact

Poullikkas outlined several potential scenarios depending on the scale and duration of the conflict.

A limited escalation scenario would involve temporary supply disruptions of about two million barrels per day. Under such conditions, Brent crude prices could fluctuate between $80 and $90 per barrel. Increased production from OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, whose combined output has risen by around 500,000 barrels per day, could partly offset supply losses.

A broader escalation involving intensified military activity and attacks on regional infrastructure could push Brent prices into the $90–$110 range. Such a scenario could increase market volatility and add inflationary pressure in energy-importing economies.

The most severe scenario would involve a wider regional conflict disrupting key energy transport routes. In that case, Iranian oil exports could fall by as much as 90%, potentially pushing Brent prices above $120 per barrel. Economic activity in energy-importing regions could also slow under those conditions.

The Cypriot Perspective

Cyprus remains heavily dependent on imported oil for electricity generation. Higher global fuel prices could therefore increase domestic electricity production costs. Poullikkas said these increases could eventually affect consumer electricity bills. He also pointed to the importance of expanding renewable energy capacity, energy storage, and electricity interconnections to reduce long-term dependence on imported fuels.

Conclusion

While global energy markets remain supported by existing reserves and diversified supply sources, the situation in the Middle East continues to introduce uncertainty for oil and gas markets. According to Poullikkas, developments in the region could influence fuel prices and energy costs for import-dependent economies, including Cyprus.

MENA Venture Capital Stable As International Investor Activity Shifts

A Data-Led Analysis Of Investor Behavior In A War-Affected Region

Venture capital activity in the Middle East and North Africa remained relatively stable one month after the escalation of regional conflict. Early data, however, indicate changes in investor behavior rather than immediate shifts in funding totals. Initial signals are visible in investor participation, capital allocation, and deal pipeline activity.

Venture Markets And The Lag In Response

Funding announcements reflect decisions made months earlier, meaning that today’s figures do not capture the full impact of current events. Investors typically adjust strategies gradually, signaling future shifts long before they are immediately visible in total funding numbers.

International Capital As The Key Pressure Indicator

Participation of international investors remains a key indicator across the MENA venture market. Global capital has historically accounted for a significant share of funding in the region. Following global interest rate increases, international participation declined through 2023. This shift was reflected in lower cross-border deal activity, more cautious capital deployment, and longer fundraising timelines.

Implications For The Broader Startup Ecosystem

Changes in international investor activity affect multiple parts of the startup ecosystem. A recovery in participation was recorded in 2024 and continued into 2025, supporting funding activity and cross-border investment. If uncertainty persists, potential effects include slower investment decisions, reduced cross-border engagement, and extended fundraising cycles. International capital also plays a role in supporting larger funding rounds and access to global networks.

Next Steps For Stakeholders

International capital represents one of several factors shaping venture activity in the region. Its movement often precedes changes in late-stage funding, startup formation, and exit activity. Investors, policymakers, and ecosystem participants rely on data and scenario analysis to assess these trends and adjust strategies.

For A Deeper Insight

Further analysis on venture activity, capital flows, and geopolitical impact across the region is available in the full MAGNiTT report.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter