Breaking news

Cyprus EU Presidency: Steering Sustainable Ocean Recovery For Europe

Strategic Moment For Marine Policy

As Cyprus assumes the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union, industry experts and environmental advocates alike see a pivotal opportunity to shape the future of EU marine policy. Leading conservation group Oceana is urging the island nation to cement decades of progress in rebuilding fisheries and to embed ocean health as a strategic pillar for EU security, climate resilience, and sustainable livelihoods.

Policy Framework And Legislative Priorities

Since its inception in 2001, Oceana has championed science-based campaigns to combat overfishing, reduce plastic pollution, and preserve critical marine habitats worldwide. The organization emphasizes that the first half of 2026 will be crucial for finalizing fisheries legislation and establishing a coherent framework that protects both marine ecosystems and the communities they support.

Key initiatives include the evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) by the European Commission, the development of the EU Ocean Act, the publication of a 2040 vision for EU fisheries, and efforts to enforce internationally agreed marine protection targets while curbing illegal fishing practices.

Economic And Environmental Imperatives

Vera Coelho, Oceana’s executive director and vice president in Europe, has described Cyprus as being “on the frontline of the devastation caused by climate change and the depletion of fish stocks in the Mediterranean.” As both a Mediterranean island and the home country of the European Commissioner for Fisheries and Oceans, Costas Kadis, Cyprus stands at a unique juncture. This dual role presents an opportunity—and a significant responsibility—to spearhead a transformative agenda in ocean policy over the coming decade.

Coelho warns that the hard-fought gains in ocean recovery are now at risk, cautioning against a “simplification” agenda driven by industrial lobbies. Such policies could undermine the sector’s recovery, jeopardizing food security, employment, and resilience in the face of the climate crisis.

Strategic Call To Action

Oceana is calling on the Cypriot Presidency to lead Council discussions that support the establishment of an Ocean Act to harmonize EU marine policies, enforce new measures, and incorporate internationally agreed targets into EU law. The organization advocates for securing the implementation of the CFP, accelerating the transition to low-impact fishing methods, rebuilding fish populations, and eliminating destructive practices in marine protected areas and deep Mediterranean waters. Additionally, it suggests revising the Common Market Organisation regulation to ensure consumer transparency for all seafood products.

In a period marked by geopolitical uncertainty, maintaining robust and coherent environmental policies is essential. Any delay or dilution of critical legislation not only risks reversing environmental recovery but also erodes the EU’s regulatory certainty and its overall strategic advantage. For European coastal communities, these policies are not just environmental imperatives—they are vital to securing a resilient and independent blue economy.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter