Breaking news

Cyprus Development Bank Net Income Falls 25% In 2025

Financial Performance Overview

The Cyprus Development Bank Group reported total net income of €17.2 million for 2025, a 25% decline compared with €22.8 million in 2024. The earnings drop was largely attributed to a significant decrease in net interest income driven by lower interest rates and a slight contraction in interest-earning assets.

Declines In Interest Income And Expense

Net interest income fell 28% year-on-year to €13.8 million from €19.1 million, as interest income declined 31% to €17.5 million. At the same time, interest expenses decreased 39% to €3.8 million, largely driven by lower deposit-related costs, while interest paid on client deposits dropped 34%. Expenses linked to loan capital also declined following the non-payment of the perpetual unsecured subordinated note.

Asset Quality And Revenue Mix

The bank’s net interest margin narrowed to 2.54% from 3.44%, while average interest-earning assets decreased 1.3% to €548 million. Non-interest income also declined 6% to €3.5 million, although operating expenses were reduced by 5%, mainly due to lower staffing costs. Staff expenses fell 10% following the absence of one-off costs recorded in the previous year, despite salary increases and a slight reduction in headcount.

Balance Sheet And Liquidity Strength

Total assets decreased 3% to €602 million, primarily reflecting lower loans and advances. Despite the decline, the group maintained strong liquidity levels, with the liquidity coverage ratio standing at 296%, significantly above the regulatory minimum requirement of 100%, although lower than the 348% recorded in 2024. Meanwhile, the net stable funding ratio remained at 236%, while liquid assets increased slightly to €407 million, representing 68% of total assets.

Loan Portfolio And Risk Management

Gross loans and advances declined 11% to €190 million as customer repayments continued exceeding new lending activity. New lending fell 60% to €13.5 million, while performing loans declined 10% to €158 million. The group also reported improvements in non-performing exposure metrics, with the NPE ratio decreasing from 17.7% to 16.9%, while net NPEs declined to €17.9 million and the NPE coverage ratio increased to 44.1%.

Capital Adequacy And Regulatory Compliance

The bank maintained a CET1 ratio of 21.93% and an overall capital adequacy ratio of 27.12%, both remaining comfortably above regulatory requirements. CET1 capital declined 3.58% to €45.6 million, partly due to supervisory adjustments related to legacy non-performing exposures and real estate assets, although the impact was partially offset by lower risk-weighted assets following updated regulatory rules.

Outlook And Strategic Priorities

The group confirmed that its financial statements continue to be prepared on a going concern basis, supported by strong liquidity and capital buffers. Management also pointed to the agreement signed in March with Bank of Cyprus regarding the sale of substantially all performing loans and deposits.

According to the bank, capital and liquidity requirements are expected to remain compliant through 2028, while no dividend will be paid for 2025 as the group continues focusing on strengthening balance sheet resilience, improving asset quality, diversifying income streams and reducing non-performing exposures.

Cyprus Crypto Users Face New Risks As MiCA Rules Take Effect

Why Investors Need To Check The Company Behind Their Crypto Platform

Crypto users in Cyprus are being urged to verify exactly which company holds their assets after the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) transition period ended on July 1, 2026.

MiCA rules for crypto-asset service providers have applied since December 2024, but Cyprus allowed companies operating under its previous national framework to continue temporarily. CySEC required providers wishing to remain in the market to apply by February 27, 2026.

The end of the transition means that appearing on an old national register is no longer enough. Investors must check the specific legal entity providing the service and the activities it is authorised to perform.

Two Regulatory Routes

CySEC maintains separate registers for providers authorised under Article 63 and companies using the Article 60 notification route.

The lists should not simply be treated as a count of licensed crypto exchanges. Providers have different regulatory statuses and may be authorised for different services, including custody, transfers, exchanges or operating trading platforms.

Companies authorised elsewhere in the EU can also serve Cypriot customers through MiCA passporting. Investors should therefore check the wider ESMA register.

Familiar Brands Can Still Be Used In Scams

MiCA authorisation applies to a specific legal entity, not automatically to every website, subsidiary or service using the same brand. Fraudsters can copy a legitimate company’s name, logo and licence number while changing its website or payment details.

The regulatory transition creates another opportunity for scammers. They can imitate legitimate notices about account closures or transfers and claim that customers must urgently move their assets to a new “regulated” platform.

In its July announcement, CySEC warned that customers using unauthorised providers do not receive MiCA protections and advised investors to verify providers through ESMA.

A Wider European Shake-Up

The changes affect the broader European crypto market. VASPnet estimated that more than 1,700 unlicensed crypto companies could face closure, relocation or restructuring after the transition period.

ESMA’s register contained 323 authorised providers at the end of July, while TRM Labs identified 1,343 operating providers in the European Economic Area on July 1, including 281 with MiCA authorisation. The different figures reflect different methodologies, but point to a substantial number of providers operating without the new authorisation.

ESMA instructed unauthorised companies to stop accepting new EU customers, opening accounts and marketing their services, while allowing limited activity needed for an orderly withdrawal.

What Investors Should Check

MiCA introduces common requirements for areas such as governance, disclosures and safeguarding client assets, but it does not make crypto investments risk-free.

For Cyprus users, the key questions are which legal entity provides the service, what it is authorised to do and whether the website or contact details are genuine.

Requests to transfer assets urgently, pay recovery fees, reveal private keys or install remote-access software should be treated as red flags. MiCA may bring greater clarity to the market, but the transition has also created a new opportunity for criminals to exploit a very real regulatory change.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter