Breaking news

Cyprus Could Turn 30,000 Empty Buildings Into New Homes

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Vacant Properties Could Be Renovated For Housing And Community Use

Cyprus has an estimated 30,000 vacant or abandoned buildings that could be renovated and brought back into use, potentially helping ease pressure on the housing market, particularly for renters.

Former parliamentary Environment Committee chairman Charalambos Theopemptou examined how other EU countries deal with vacant properties and outlined several measures Cyprus could consider.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Lessons From Europe

Countries such as Ireland, France, Spain and Portugal use different combinations of renovation grants, tax measures and urban renewal programmes to encourage owners to bring empty properties back into use.

Ireland offers grants of up to €50,000 for vacant homes and €70,000 for derelict properties, while France and Spain use tax measures in areas with high housing demand. Portugal supports renovation through a dedicated urban renewal fund. Cyprus currently offers grants of up to €40,000 for renovating a three-bedroom home.

Creating A National Register

Theopemptou suggested creating a comprehensive register of vacant, abandoned and dangerous buildings, with municipalities and communities working alongside the Interior Ministry and technical services.

Properties could be classified according to their condition, historical or architectural value and location. Buildings near schools, public transport, local centres or areas with demand for affordable housing could receive priority.

He also proposed combining financial incentives with simpler procedures and faster technical assistance for owners willing to restore unused properties.

Putting Empty Buildings To Work

Once renovated, vacant properties could provide affordable and student housing, small businesses, cultural spaces and other community facilities. Long-term leases, partnerships with owners, social enterprises and unused municipal buildings could also contribute.

Many properties may not require major reconstruction. Structural assessments, cleaning, basic repairs, energy improvements, accessibility upgrades and reconnection to utilities could be enough to return some buildings to use.

Theopemptou also called for faster permits for smaller renovation projects and greater use of EU funding linked to the Renovation Wave initiative. Local authorities could further improve transparency by publishing data on vacant properties, including how many have been classified as dangerous, renovated or returned to use.

Bringing more of Cyprus’s unused buildings back into circulation could increase the housing supply while revitalising neighbourhoods and improving quality of life.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.