Breaking news

Cyprus Consumers Association Alerts Travelers On Refund Safeguards Amid Agency Disputes

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 23, 2025

Overview Of The Issue

The Cyprus Consumers Association has issued an urgent advisory following a notable surge in complaints directed at a travel agency that failed to fulfill its refund obligations for undelivered services. Although the agency in question was not specifically named, the inquiry highlights widespread concerns regarding operational accountability in the travel industry.

Legislative And Regulatory Safeguards

Under current legislation, travel organizers are mandated to provide a comprehensive guarantee covering the entire sum paid by customers for services that remain unprovided. The Consumers Association underscored that the Consumer Protection Service, in coordination with the Association of Cyprus Travel & Tourism Agents (the designated approved body by the Minister of Energy, Commerce and Industry), is responsible for supervising and enforcing these guarantees.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Activation Of The Guarantee

In instances where a travel organizer is unable to meet its commitments, the guarantee is triggered automatically. Funds are then allocated promptly to travelers who did not receive the services they had paid for, ensuring prompt restitution without undue delays. This measure is pivotal in maintaining consumer trust and protecting financial interests.

Consumer Advisory And Best Practices

The association advised travelers to meticulously verify that their selected travel agency is a properly registered travel organizer and maintains the legally required insolvency guarantee. Emphasizing the significance of these checks, the advisory noted that a lapse in such due diligence could jeopardize the excitement and security inherent to planned journeys.

Reporting Non-Compliance

Consumers who have been informed that paid services will not be delivered are urged to contact the Cyprus Consumers Association directly via email, providing all pertinent booking details for immediate assistance and investigation.

Wider European Consumer Protection Initiatives

In a related development, the European Commission and the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network have recently secured an agreement with major travel platforms such as Expedia and Lastminute.com. These industry leaders are now obligated to guarantee refunds within 14 days for cancelled flights and ensure transparency in contact information and customer rights. These enhanced measures extend to additional platforms, including Edreams ODIGEO, Etraveli Group, and Kiwi.com, all under the same robust standards.

Conclusion

As the regulatory environment tightens and consumers become increasingly vigilant, the Cyprus Consumers Association’s proactive measures serve as a critical reminder of the importance of compliance and consumer protection in the travel industry. Stakeholders across the sector are urged to uphold these standards to foster a trustworthy and resilient market environment.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.