Breaking news

Cyprus Can’t Weatherproof Its Economy With Halloumi Alone

As global markets brace for the ripple effects of U.S. tariffs and escalating trade tensions, Cyprus remains curiously optimistic, reacting more to the potential price of halloumi in Manhattan than to the deeper structural vulnerabilities exposed by this moment. The real problem isn’t Trump’s tariffs. It’s Cyprus’s chronic habit of planning for perpetual sunshine in a world where economic storms are increasingly common.

The Halloumi Distraction

When news broke of Trump’s 10% tariffs, the public conversation in Cyprus largely revolved around dairy. Will halloumi cost more in the U.S.? Will Americans still buy it? Yes, a €10 million slice of the halloumi export pie may be at risk—but that accounts for just 3% of total global halloumi sales, which topped €324 million last year. In real terms, a $2 uptick on a $12 block of halloumi barely moves the needle.

Salt, olive oil, and even sugar were also dragged into the drama. But while tariffs may raise prices at the margins, they’re not about to send Cyprus’s economy into a tailspin. The danger lies elsewhere: in a local policy mindset that’s still banking on uninterrupted growth.

Budgeting For The Boom, Ignoring The Bust

Just weeks before these tariffs made headlines, Cyprus’ Parliament voted to lift a longstanding freeze on public and semi-public sector hiring—a move initiated well before global markets showed signs of turbulence. The argument? Cyprus was financially strong enough to afford it.

But that logic only works if you assume the good times will last. Now, with a fresh wave of global economic uncertainty taking shape, the government is still pushing forward with policies designed for prosperity, not resilience. That’s a gamble—and history suggests it’s not one Cyprus can afford to keep making.

Public sector wage hikes and expanded hiring may look like progress on paper, but they risk dragging the country backward if another global downturn hits. Private sector workers, after all, are the ones who’ve repeatedly borne the brunt of past crises. They’re first to lose, last to recover—and often forgotten when the next wave of government spending begins.

A Three-Month Wake-Up Call

The 90-day buffer before the full force of U.S. tariffs kicks in offers Cyprus a rare gift: time. Time to think, plan, and pivot. Rather than react to each new headline, the country has a window to develop a forward-looking strategy—one built on economic realism, not optimism.

This doesn’t mean panicking or slashing public programs. It means balancing ambition with prudence, ensuring that future decisions reflect both the potential of growth and the reality of risk.

The Real Threat To Halloumi

Ironically, while the U.S. tariffs made noise, the louder alarm is coming from Brussels. The EU’s Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) status for halloumi could have devastating consequences if enforced without compromise. A new regulation requiring at least 51% of all halloumi to be made from goat or sheep’s milk by 2029 threatens up to 60% of exports, according to Cyprus’ dairy producers’ association.

Unlike the marginal impact of U.S. tariffs, the PDO rules could dismantle a €324 million export engine and put over 15,000 jobs at risk. The government is aware and has introduced a digital system to track milk sourcing and meet existing quotas. But compliance with the future standard is logistically improbable, given local supply constraints.

A committee chaired by Chamber of Commerce head Stavros Stavrou is now lobbying for a more realistic compromise. If Brussels won’t budge, Cyprus may be forced to amend the PDO file itself—or risk losing the international market that’s been built over decades.

Conclusion: Prepare Smarter, Not Louder

Cyprus’ economic vulnerabilities go beyond tariffs or dairy quotas. What’s missing is a mindset shift—from reactive firefighting to proactive planning. Tariffs are temporary. Trade wars may fade. But unless Cyprus stops anchoring its policies to good times and “what ifs,” it will remain unprepared for the economic realities of tomorrow.

Halloumi deserves protection. But so does the broader economy. And that starts with treating global signals—like Trump’s tariffs—not as passing headlines, but as warning shots.

Cyprus doesn’t need to panic. But it does need to be prepared. Because in today’s world, having an umbrella isn’t pessimism—it’s just smart policy.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter