Breaking news

Cyprus Budget Deficit Rises To €1.79 Billion In 2025

Overview Of The Fiscal Report

Cyprus recorded a state budget deficit of €1.79 billion in 2025, according to the latest fiscal report from the Treasury. The report compares planned and actual revenues and expenditures and is submitted annually by the Accountant General within three months of the financial year’s end.

Fiscal Report Insights And Approval Process

The report was prepared by Accountant General Andreas Antoniades and submitted to Finance Minister Makis Keravnos on March 12, 2026. It was approved by the Cabinet on March 16 and later submitted to the House of Representatives on March 23. An audit by the Auditor General is also included, supporting the accuracy of the financial data.

Revenue And Expenditure Trends

Revenues, excluding loan-related inflows, reached €10.05 billion in 2025, up from €9.57 billion in 2024, while expenditures rose to €10.15 billion from €9.89 billion. This resulted in a pre-borrowing deficit of €0.10 billion, compared to €0.32 billion the previous year.

Impact Of Loan Activities On The Fiscal Position

Once loan activity is included, the overall deficit widens. Loan drawdowns and repayments fell to €0.16 billion in 2025, down from €1.24 billion in 2024. At the same time, spending related to loan repayments and issuances declined to €1.85 billion from €2.53 billion. As a result, the total budget deficit increased to €1.79 billion, compared to €1.61 billion a year earlier.

The Central Role Of Taxation

Tax revenue remained the main source of state income, reaching €8.6 billion in 2025, up from €8 billion in 2024. This accounts for around 86% of total revenues. The structure remained broadly unchanged, with 44% coming from indirect taxes and 42% from direct taxes.

Key Expenditure Categories And Public Debt Overview

Spending on public sector wages, pensions and gratuities totalled €3.52 billion. Social benefits reached €2.02 billion, including a €0.82 billion state contribution to the General Healthcare System. Grants and contributions to public entities and international organisations amounted to €1.67 billion.

Total government debt, excluding intra-government borrowing, declined to €19.24 billion at the end of 2025, from €20.92 billion a year earlier. At the same time, intra-government borrowing increased to €13.21 billion from €12.03 billion.

Conclusion

The report shows a narrowing deficit before borrowing, alongside a higher overall deficit once loan activity is included. At the same time, tax revenues continue to support public finances, while government debt remains on a downward path.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter