Breaking news

Cyprus At The Intersection Of Alternative Credit And Maritime Financing

Cyprus: A Dual Pillar In Financing And Maritime Excellence

Cyprus has emerged as a strategic nexus for investors and industry leaders, boasting a robust fund framework alongside a globally acclaimed ship management center. Michalis Vasiliou, Executive Director at H.M. Pelagic Partners Ltd and Board Secretary at the Cyprus Investment Funds Association, highlights how the island’s unique duality positions it at the forefront of merging alternative credit with maritime financing.

Alternative Credit: A Force Reshaping Europe’s Fund Industry

Alternative credit, one of the fastest growing segments in Europe’s fund landscape, is drawing increased attention. With global private credit markets surpassing USD 2.1 trillion, as based on IMF estimates, investors are keen to connect capital with real-economy initiatives. This financial instrument offers flexible financing solutions, essential as banks recalibrate amid tightening regulatory norms. The European Central Bank has recognized that private credit now plays a crucial role in complementing traditional bank lending, a shift further bolstered by a moderating cost of capital in both Europe and the United States.

Maritime And Funds: Converging Worlds

Upcoming events like Maritime Cyprus 2025 and the International Funds Summit are set to explore the convergence of maritime operations with fund management. Vasiliou notes that the shipping sector—a highly capital-intensive industry reliant on diverse financing tools such as leasing, sale-and-leaseback, and asset-backed financing—is experiencing a paradigm shift. As traditional lenders recede, alternative credit structures offer consistent cash flows and predictable yields, providing an attractive alternative for investors seeking diversification without direct exposure to market volatility.

Building Resilience In An Uncertain Global Landscape

Investors are increasingly drawn to maritime credit for its stability, largely insulated from the cyclical nature of freight rates and asset valuations. However, Vasiliou cautions that robust governance and risk management remain paramount. With evolving regulatory measures—exemplified by new U.S. port-entry fees impacting vessels with Chinese ties—diversified funding sources become more critical. European credit frameworks, with their enhanced transparency and stability, are well-positioned to provide the necessary resilience for global portfolios.

A Strategic Roadmap For The Future

Vasiliou’s insights underscore Cyprus’ strategic advantage. With its recognized position as both an EU fund hub and a premier global ship management center (handling approximately 20% of worldwide third-party ship management), Cyprus is uniquely placed to harness alternative financing trends. As the industry continues to evolve, the island stands ready to frame its dual legacy into a powerful narrative of innovation and stability in linking real-economy sectors with cutting-edge financial strategies.

The next chapter in Europe’s funds industry will likely be defined by the capacity of managers to seamlessly integrate innovative financing solutions with the evolving needs of the real economy—and Cyprus is poised to lead that transformation.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter