Breaking news

Cyprus Achieves Robust Absorption Targets Under Thaleia 2021-2027

Cyprus has emerged as a frontrunner in the European Union by surpassing its annual absorption target under the Thaleia 2021-2027 program. Penelope Papavasileiou, President of the Monitoring Committee and General Director of Development, confirmed that the island nation has met its 2025 target ahead of schedule, ranking fourth among the 27 member states.

Strategic Investments For A Sustainable Future

The thrust of the Thaleia initiative focuses on high-impact, sustainable investments that span across green energy projects, renewable energy sources, and significant infrastructure advancements. The program also allocates funds for combating poverty and unemployment, as well as addressing water scarcity and enhancing water resilience. Backed by both European and national resources, this comprehensive approach underscores Cyprus’ commitment to achieving long-term socioeconomic progress.

Robust Oversight And Project Implementation

The recent session of the Monitoring Committee, convened by the Ministry of Finance’s General Directorate of Development, highlighted the program’s unwavering momentum. With nearly all project invitations issued and the full program budget effectively allocated, Cyprus has set an impressive pace of execution. The mid-term review held in March 2025 further substantiated the strong performance metrics, ensuring that each investment meets its strategic milestones.

Legacy Accomplishments And Future Prospects

Beyond the current achievements, Papavasileiou underscored that the previous period (2014-2020) concluded with 100% fund absorption, establishing a robust legacy for further initiatives. Preparations are already underway for the 2028-2034 period, with these efforts poised to gain additional significance as Cyprus assumes the EU Council Presidency in early 2026.

Innovative Community Projects

During the session, detailed presentations underscored the tangible benefits of the program through projects like the strategic transformation of the Old Municipal Sports Center into a green recreational hub—a project successfully completed in 2025. Additionally, the “Technical And Vocational Training And Education” initiative received accolades from educators and students at Makarios Technical School, who demonstrated how upgraded technical education programs are enhancing both teaching quality and institutional functionality.

Industry leaders, government officials, local authorities, economic and social partners, civil society representatives, research experts, and members of the European Commission all collaborated to ensure that the Thaleia program remains a cornerstone of Cyprus’s developmental strategy.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter