Breaking news

Competitive Dynamics In The European Economy Amid Inflation And Wage Pressures

Amid ongoing debates about the economic impact of inflation and wage growth, the European Commission’s latest report, After the Inflation Shock: A Review of Price and Cost Competitiveness in the EU, offers a comprehensive look at how inflation has affected member states differently. The study notes that several Central and Eastern European countries experienced sharp real price increases, which in turn weakened price competitiveness. These pressures were largely driven by higher import costs, expanding profit margins, and accelerating wages.

Inflation, Productivity, And Economic Resilience

The report highlights that in economies such as Ireland, Cyprus, and Malta, productivity growth has generally kept pace with or exceeded wage increases. This alignment has helped contain domestic labour costs per unit of output. Maintaining this balance is critical, as wage growth that significantly outstrips productivity can trigger a self-reinforcing cycle of rising costs and inflation, ultimately eroding competitiveness.

Divergent National Trends And Their Implications

Across the EU, wage and productivity dynamics have varied widely between 2020 and 2024. In Lithuania and Croatia, inflation-adjusted wage data show that real wages rose markedly faster than productivity. Bulgaria and Romania present a more nuanced picture: while the Harmonised Consumer Price Index suggested moderate inflation, GDP-deflator adjustments indicate that wage growth was closer to productivity trends. Latvia recorded particularly strong real wage gains well above productivity improvements, whereas Slovakia and the Czech Republic continue to face noticeable mismatches between wage growth and output efficiency, each driven by different structural factors.

Inflation’s Role In Determining Competitiveness

A key takeaway of the report is that inflation alone does not automatically translate into lost competitiveness. Initial economic positioning, sector composition, and productivity trajectories play equally important roles. Although inflation gaps across EU countries have narrowed compared to the immediate post-pandemic period, several economies still face persistent price pressures. These began to accelerate again in 2025, suggesting that short-term disparities in price competitiveness may remain.

Supply-Side And Domestic Influences On Inflation

Inflation patterns within the EU have been shaped by both external shocks and domestic decisions. Central and Eastern European economies were hit hardest by import-driven cost increases, particularly in energy. In contrast, countries such as France, Greece, Italy, and Finland recorded more moderate inflation rates between 2020 and 2024. Domestic drivers also played a meaningful role, including shifts in corporate profit margins and sustained wage growth, underscoring that competitiveness cannot be assessed through inflation metrics alone.

Measured Wage Adjustments Sustain Competitiveness In Cyprus

Cyprus provides an example of a more measured approach. Wage growth has remained relatively contained while labour productivity has continued to improve. According to the Central Bank of Cyprus’ December 2025 Economic Bulletin, nominal wage expenditure rose by 4% during the first nine months of 2025, while real wages increased by 3.3%. This moderation has helped keep unit labour costs below the eurozone average and supported the country’s overall competitive position.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter