Breaking news

China Takes Legal Action Against EU Over Electric Vehicle Tariff Hike

China has launched a legal dispute against the European Union (EU) at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in response to the EU’s decision to raise import tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). The case comes on the heels of an EU investigation that concluded Chinese carmakers benefit from state subsidies, giving them an unfair edge in the European market.

Key Details:

  1. WTO Complaint: China’s filing marks its second WTO challenge over higher tariffs, with the complaint aiming to address the EU’s determination that Chinese EV manufacturers benefit from unfair government support.
  2. Impact on Chinese Car Makers: The new EU tariffs range from 17% for BYD, 18.8% for Geely (Volvo’s parent company), to a significant 35.3% for SAIC Motor Corp, making it one of the most heavily affected companies.
  3. WTO Dispute Timeline: Under WTO dispute settlement rules, China and the EU have 60 days to negotiate a resolution. If unresolved, the case may proceed to a WTO panel ruling. However, the WTO’s highest appellate body remains inactive due to a shortage of judges, potentially complicating the resolution process.

The heightened tariffs, which took effect on November 1, reflect growing trade friction between Brussels and Beijing. EU officials argue that China’s subsidies and access to inexpensive raw materials have granted Chinese EV companies excessive leverage over European competitors. In response, Brussels is exploring solutions, such as adjusting price commitments, to address these market imbalances while upholding WTO principles.

Negotiations between the EU and Chinese officials are expected to intensify in the coming weeks, with an EU delegation likely to travel to China to pursue a compromise. Both sides aim to foster fair market conditions while respecting WTO guidelines.

$250 Million VideoVerse Deal Unravels Amid Fraud Allegations

What began as a major success for India’s startup ecosystem has turned into a complex legal dispute less than a year after VideoVerse was acquired for $250 million.

The deal was announced in September 2025 by VideoVerse and international sports publisher Minute Media. VideoVerse had developed AI-powered software for turning sports broadcasts into short clips, with plans to expand the technology internationally.

The deal has since unravelled. Investors are still waiting for proceeds, while founder Vinayak Shrivastav faces multiple legal claims. In May, Minute Media terminated its agreement with VideoVerse, citing “significant discrepancies” in the company’s representations.

Investors Seek Millions

Bluestone Capital, which backed VideoVerse in 2023, is suing the company for fraud and alleges that it failed to distribute acquisition proceeds as required.

Another creditor is seeking $64 million from a loan Shrivastav took out shortly after the acquisition. The complaint alleges that fraudulent merger documents were used to secure shareholder approval.

Former COO Sabya Das has separately accused Shrivastav of forging his signature on loan and share-repurchase agreements that allegedly resulted in tens of millions of dollars being extracted from the company.

The allegations have not been proven in court, and Shrivastav did not respond to requests for comment.

Loan Raises Further Questions

In October 2025, Shrivastav arranged a $55 million structured loan from investment firm Lingotto. According to court filings, $53 million was transferred to an account controlled by VideoVerse.

Lingotto now alleges that documents supporting the loan were forged, including papers supposedly signed by Minute Media’s CEO, while screenshots showing company bank balances were also allegedly fabricated.

After a $4 million payment due in March was missed, Lingotto demanded repayment and discovered other creditors were also awaiting payments. Shrivastav was removed as CEO by the end of April.

From AI Startup To Legal Dispute

VideoVerse had built a strong position in automated sports content through its Magnifi platform, which uses AI to identify key moments and players and create short-form clips. Its customers included the Indian Premier League, FIFA+ and Nippon TV.

Minute Media had hoped to use the technology to expand internationally. Instead, the acquisition has triggered multiple legal battles over missing funds, disputed agreements and the conduct of the company’s leadership.

Cases involving Minute Media, Lingotto, Bluestone Capital and former executives are now being heard in Delaware Chancery Court, leaving investors and creditors seeking answers about what happened to the money and whether the $250 million deal received adequate due diligence.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter