Breaking news

China Takes Legal Action Against EU Over Electric Vehicle Tariff Hike

China has launched a legal dispute against the European Union (EU) at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in response to the EU’s decision to raise import tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). The case comes on the heels of an EU investigation that concluded Chinese carmakers benefit from state subsidies, giving them an unfair edge in the European market.

Key Details:

  1. WTO Complaint: China’s filing marks its second WTO challenge over higher tariffs, with the complaint aiming to address the EU’s determination that Chinese EV manufacturers benefit from unfair government support.
  2. Impact on Chinese Car Makers: The new EU tariffs range from 17% for BYD, 18.8% for Geely (Volvo’s parent company), to a significant 35.3% for SAIC Motor Corp, making it one of the most heavily affected companies.
  3. WTO Dispute Timeline: Under WTO dispute settlement rules, China and the EU have 60 days to negotiate a resolution. If unresolved, the case may proceed to a WTO panel ruling. However, the WTO’s highest appellate body remains inactive due to a shortage of judges, potentially complicating the resolution process.

The heightened tariffs, which took effect on November 1, reflect growing trade friction between Brussels and Beijing. EU officials argue that China’s subsidies and access to inexpensive raw materials have granted Chinese EV companies excessive leverage over European competitors. In response, Brussels is exploring solutions, such as adjusting price commitments, to address these market imbalances while upholding WTO principles.

Negotiations between the EU and Chinese officials are expected to intensify in the coming weeks, with an EU delegation likely to travel to China to pursue a compromise. Both sides aim to foster fair market conditions while respecting WTO guidelines.

How Permitting Delays Add €60,000 To The Cost Of A New Apartment In Cyprus

Planning and permitting delays are quietly becoming one of the biggest cost drivers in Cyprus’s housing market, adding an estimated €60,000 to the price of the average new apartment without increasing developers’ profits.

That is the warning from Yiannis Misirlis, chairman of the Cyprus Property Developers Association (CPDA), who argues that delays, rather than construction costs alone, are becoming one of the biggest drivers of housing affordability.

A Realistic Project, A Very Different Outcome

To illustrate the impact, Misirlis pointed to a residential development of 125 apartments with a €7 million land cost and €25 million in construction and development expenses, bringing the initial investment to €32 million.

He compared two scenarios. In the first, permits are secured within six months, and construction begins immediately, allowing the project to be completed two years later. In the second, planning approvals delay construction by four years, while the build itself still takes two years.

“At first glance, the only difference appears to be time. In reality, the entire financial structure of the project changes,”

Misirlis said.

Where The Costs Accumulate

Keeping €7 million tied up for four years creates significant financing costs. Using a 6% cost of capital, Misirlis estimates that land holding alone adds about €1.7 million.

Professional and administrative costs also continue to accumulate while the project awaits approval, adding an estimated €800,000 over four years.

Construction inflation further increases the bill. Assuming costs rise by 4% annually, the original €25 million construction budget grows by roughly €3.8 million.

Together, those factors add about €6.3 million to the project before any profit is taken into account. Misirlis noted that the estimate excludes higher financing costs, interest rate movements, energy price increases, legal disputes, additional banking charges and regulatory changes.

How Delays Affect Apartment Prices

In the first scenario, a €32 million project would require total sales of around €38.4 million to achieve a commercially sustainable 20% profit margin, translating into an average selling price of roughly €307,000 per apartment.

After four years of permitting delays, development costs rise to about €38.3 million. Maintaining the same profit margin pushes total sales to approximately €46 million, increasing the average apartment price to around €368,000.

“The developer’s profitability has not increased by a single euro. Yet the average selling price rises by about €60,000 per apartment solely because of delays in the permitting process,”

Misirlis said.

A Supply Problem, Not Just A Cost Problem

Misirlis argues that the impact extends well beyond a single development. Lengthy approval processes reduce the number of projects that can be completed over time, limiting housing supply while placing further upward pressure on prices.

For that reason, he believes planning efficiency should be central to any discussion about housing affordability.

“Any meaningful conversation about affordable housing must address the efficiency of the planning and permitting system. When approvals immobilise capital for years, increase development costs, constrain housing supply and create uncertainty, the resulting costs are ultimately transferred to households,”

he said.

He stressed that faster permitting should not come at the expense of planning standards or environmental safeguards.

“No responsible developer is asking for fewer checks. We are asking for the same checks to be completed within reasonable and predictable timeframes,”

Misirlis said.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter