Breaking news

China Takes Legal Action Against EU Over Electric Vehicle Tariff Hike

China has launched a legal dispute against the European Union (EU) at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in response to the EU’s decision to raise import tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). The case comes on the heels of an EU investigation that concluded Chinese carmakers benefit from state subsidies, giving them an unfair edge in the European market.

Key Details:

  1. WTO Complaint: China’s filing marks its second WTO challenge over higher tariffs, with the complaint aiming to address the EU’s determination that Chinese EV manufacturers benefit from unfair government support.
  2. Impact on Chinese Car Makers: The new EU tariffs range from 17% for BYD, 18.8% for Geely (Volvo’s parent company), to a significant 35.3% for SAIC Motor Corp, making it one of the most heavily affected companies.
  3. WTO Dispute Timeline: Under WTO dispute settlement rules, China and the EU have 60 days to negotiate a resolution. If unresolved, the case may proceed to a WTO panel ruling. However, the WTO’s highest appellate body remains inactive due to a shortage of judges, potentially complicating the resolution process.

The heightened tariffs, which took effect on November 1, reflect growing trade friction between Brussels and Beijing. EU officials argue that China’s subsidies and access to inexpensive raw materials have granted Chinese EV companies excessive leverage over European competitors. In response, Brussels is exploring solutions, such as adjusting price commitments, to address these market imbalances while upholding WTO principles.

Negotiations between the EU and Chinese officials are expected to intensify in the coming weeks, with an EU delegation likely to travel to China to pursue a compromise. Both sides aim to foster fair market conditions while respecting WTO guidelines.

Cyprus Banks Urged To Focus On Long-Term Resilience As Profits Remain Strong

The Cypriot banking sector remains in a strong position, supported by solid capital buffers and overall financial stability, according to speakers at the annual general meeting of the Association of Cyprus Banks. At the same time, government officials and regulators stressed that maintaining this position will require continued discipline and long-term planning.

A Strong Sector, But Not A Complacent One

Finance Minister Makis Keravnos used the meeting to highlight concerns over draft laws recently passed by parliament, which, according to the Ministry of Finance, the Central Bank and the Legal Service, may contain constitutional, legal and institutional issues. Those concerns, he noted, led to presidential referrals and remittals to the Supreme Court.

Keravnos also said the European Central Bank had been consulted on proposed measures concerning the suspension of foreclosures and the restructuring of loans and guarantees, adding that the ECB had expressed its own concerns.

Profitability Should Reflect Real Economy Lending

While acknowledging that the banking sector remains highly profitable, Keravnos said earnings are expected to reach around €1 billion in 2025, lower than in 2024 as interest-rate conditions gradually normalize.

He said he would prefer bank profitability to rely more on lending to businesses operating in productive sectors and less on the widening of European Central Bank interest-rate spreads.

According to the minister, Cyprus’ return to investment-grade status after 11 years has strengthened the country’s appeal to foreign investors, technology companies and startups. He said this should encourage banks to offer financing that better supports businesses while improving the diversification of their loan portfolios.

The Central Bank’s Warning: Strength Today Is Not A Guarantee Tomorrow

Central Bank Governor Christodoulos Patsalides also warned against complacency, saying the sector’s current strength should not be taken for granted.

“The Cypriot banking sector is strong today. But strength that truly matters is not exhausted by a capital ratio, a profit line or a favorable cycle,” he said.

Patsalides added that lasting resilience depends on institutions remaining strong as conditions change, risks become more complex, and competition evolves. In his view, that requires sufficient capital buffers, adaptable infrastructure and management teams prepared for changing market conditions.

Long-Term Resilience Over Short-Term Gains

Patsalides also stressed that banks should focus on long-term resilience rather than short-term performance. Decisions on dividend policy, capital allocation and the use of resources, he said, should take into account continued investment in technology, operational resilience, human capital and long-term adaptability.

He added that banks able to remain competitive over time will be those that invest early in strengthening their capacity to adapt and respond to future challenges.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter