CHAK Privatization Advances Under Revised Cyprus Investment Rules

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 23, 2026

Overview Of New Legislation

The Cyprus Parliament unanimously approved legislation that opens the way for the privatization of CHAK. Under the new framework, investor selection will no longer rely solely on the highest financial offer. Evaluation criteria now include qualitative factors, such as the investor’s business plan and its potential contribution to developing the stock market.

Emphasizing Strategic Investment Over Price

Christiana Erotokritou, President of the Parliamentary Economic Committee and member of DIKO, said the reform is important for both Cyprus’ economy and the future of CHAK. She noted that the exchange has not reached its full potential and stressed that the goal is to attract a strategic investor from a regulated market rather than simply sell a state asset. She also welcomed the Ministry of Finance’s decision to incorporate proposals submitted by DIKO during the legislative process.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Ensuring Sustainable Market Growth

Haris Georgiadis, a DISY parliamentarian, added that the inclusion of qualitative parameters in the evaluation process is designed to secure the sustainable and positive growth of CHAK. This strategic outlook reflects a broader commitment to strengthening the competitiveness and credibility of Cyprus’ financial sector.

Institutional Reforms And Employee Protections

According to the Ministry of Finance, the legislation forms part of a broader capital market modernization plan. The law provides a framework for the gradual transfer of responsibilities related to the Central Securities Depository and the Central Register of Securities to a strategic investor, while maintaining operational continuity and safeguarding public interest.

Protection Of Employee Rights

Another critical aspect of the legislation is its provision for defending the labor rights of CHAK’s workforce. The bill ensures a smooth transfer of employees to the Ministry of Finance, or alternatively, facilitates compensation based on a defined early voluntary retirement plan, which further underscores the commitment to social responsibility during this transition.

Looking Ahead

The Ministry of Finance has expressed its gratitude towards Parliament members and, in particular, the Parliamentary Committee on Economic and Budgetary Affairs, for their collaboration in finalizing this important reform. The commitment to effectively implement the law underscores the government’s dedication to fostering an environment that supports long-term economic growth and stability in Cyprus.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news