Breaking news

Catalyzing Growth: The Strategic Imperative Of Mergers And Acquisitions For Cyprus’ Competitiveness

Overview Of The Strategic Proposal

The Cyprus Council of Economy and Competitiveness (SOAK) has unveiled a comprehensive policy agenda aimed at stimulating mergers and acquisitions as a pathway to enhancing the competitiveness of the Cypriot economy. At the heart of this proposal is the recognition that the predominance of small businesses—nearly 90% employing fewer than 10 individuals—limits scalability, investment potential, and international business engagement.

The Scale Challenge And Its Implications

The council emphasizes that larger organizations benefit from significant advantages, including economies of scale, stronger bargaining power, improved access to finance, and enhanced capabilities in research and development. Moreover, these entities tend to exhibit greater operational resilience and easier entry into international markets through exports or strategic partnerships. However, it is cautioned that increased size is not a panacea; the pitfalls of bureaucracy and organizational rigidity can potentially stifle customer responsiveness and flexibility in rapidly shifting market dynamics.

Competitive Positioning And Policy Ambiguity

The report from SOAK underscores a conflicting policy environment where mixed signals may discourage corporate expansion. Notably, Cyprus ranks 44th out of 69 countries in the IMD Global Competitiveness Ranking for 2025, reflecting a decline in economic performance due to shifts in international investment flows and infrastructural shortcomings. In response, ongoing reforms in taxation, judicial processes, and labor market regulations—including an action plan from the Ministry of Finance—are geared toward addressing these issues and bolstering market dynamism.

Setting Strategic Objectives And Evaluating Impact

Before the implementation of these new measures, the council insists on the importance of establishing clear strategic goals and rigorously assessing the broader economic, social, and environmental implications. It is also essential to differentiate between the sectors and business types that would most benefit from scaling up, thereby avoiding pitfalls that could restrict innovative startups—a critical engine of technological advancement. Additionally, with the European Commission promoting merger and acquisition incentives through regulatory streamlining, financial support, and diplomatic initiatives, maintaining robust competition while pursuing sustainable growth remains paramount.

Key Data Points And Comparative Analysis

SOAK calls for a detailed collection and analysis of data across sectors that benefit from economies of scale, face intense international rivalry, and include both traditional industries and emerging markets. The council argues that it is counterproductive to encourage businesses to remain small—for instance, to retain existing subsidies or avoid the increased costs of compliance—when competitors abroad capitalize on scale. Comparative case studies from Singapore, Ireland, Brazil, and India are suggested to provide valuable lessons in scaling operations effectively.

Assessing Indirect Impacts And The Financial Ecosystem

The council stresses that while direct contributions to GDP are important, they should not be the sole metric of success. A holistic evaluation must consider resource adequacy in terms of labor, energy, water supply, and infrastructure, as well as consequences for property values, service costs, environmental effects, labor market transformations, and even potential reactions from other EU member states.

Policy Recommendations And Best Practices

The council’s proposal encompasses a broad range of strategies including:

  • Development Of An Ecosystem Supporting Startups, Accelerators, And Incubators With A Focus On Early-Stage Financing And Mentorship
  • Creation Of Public Platforms To Connect Domestic Buyers With Cypriot Enterprises For Business Expansion Or Sale
  • Promotion Of Cyprus As A Regional Hub Bridging The EU, the Middle East, And Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Establishment Of Bilateral Investment Agreements To Facilitate Capital Flows And Overseas Expansion
  • Investment In Digital Infrastructure For Enhanced Due Diligence And Remote Transactions
  • Specialized Training For Legal And Financial Experts In Cross-Border M&A
  • Reevaluation Of The De Minimis Application To Prevent Discouragement Of Consolidations
  • Simplification Of Administrative Processes And Reduction Or Elimination Of Excessive Fees And Tax Burdens In M&A
  • Formation Of Dedicated Public And Judicial Units To Handle Major Enterprise And M&A Cases
  • Strengthening Of Minority Shareholder Protection And Corporate Governance Through Incentives Like Listing On The Cyprus Stock Exchange (HACK) Or Other Regulated Markets
  • Expansion Of Funding Sources Beyond Banking Channels, Including Corporate Bonds, Institutional Investors, And Attraction Of Foreign Capital
  • Enhancement Of E-Governance And Reevaluation Of Compliance Rules That Disproportionately Affect Large Enterprises

Navigating The Financing Conundrum

A significant obstacle in advancing mergers and acquisitions is securing adequate financing, particularly in light of the limited role of the domestic capital market and the absence of national development finance institutions. SOAK advocates for a reconsideration of establishing such an institution or adopting alternative flexible mechanisms. Collaborations with European financial bodies such as the European Investment Bank could help lower financing costs and broaden access to alternative funding sources.

Conclusion

As Cyprus navigates its path toward a more competitive economic landscape, the council’s recommendations underscore the necessity of a balanced and forward-looking approach. By carefully aligning policy measures with strategic objectives and ensuring that funding mechanisms and regulatory frameworks are conducive to scaling operations, Cyprus can better position itself in the global marketplace while safeguarding sustainable growth.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter