Breaking Barriers: New EU Rules to Boost Gender Balance on Corporate Boards

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

January 6, 2025

The European Union has taken a significant step toward gender equality in the boardroom with a directive on gender balance that officially came into force at the end of 2024. Announced by the European Commission, the legislation aims to ensure more equitable representation of men and women on corporate boards across member states.

Key Highlights

The directive mandates that women must make up at least 40% of non-executive directors and 33% of all directors in large European companies.
Member states were required to adapt their national legislation to align with the directive by December 28, 2024, with companies expected to meet these targets by June 2026.
The selection processes for board appointments must be transparent, ensuring equal consideration for all candidates. In cases where male and female candidates are equally qualified, the directive stipulates that preference should be given to the woman.
Unsuccessful candidates can request information about the selection criteria, promoting accountability in the hiring process.
Companies failing to comply with the directive’s requirements could face fines or even annulment of disputed board appointments.
EU member states are tasked with maintaining a public registry of companies that achieve these gender balance goals, as well as designating authorities to monitor, promote, and support progress.

The Bigger Picture

Currently, women hold an average of 34% of board positions in the EU. While progress has been steady since 2010, the pace varies significantly across member states, with some seeing stagnation in recent years, according to the European Commission.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Spotlight on Cyprus

Cyprus is gradually making progress in enhancing gender representation in leadership roles. While the island nation has traditionally faced challenges in achieving gender balance, recent years have seen a growing recognition of the importance of equality in corporate governance.

Currently, women occupy approximately 20% of board positions in major Cypriot companies, with some sectors, such as finance and tourism, showing more noticeable improvements. However, this figure still lags behind the EU average of 34%.

To align with the EU directive, Cyprus is working on implementing transparent board selection processes and promoting policies that encourage women to step into leadership roles. Local initiatives, including mentoring programs and leadership training for women, are gaining traction and aim to address the systemic barriers that have historically limited female participation at the top levels of management.

Cyprus’s progress, though slower compared to some EU nations, reflects a broader cultural and structural shift toward inclusivity. As the EU deadline approaches in 2026, the hope is that Cyprus will achieve significant strides in gender equality, paving the way for more balanced representation in corporate leadership.

Conclusion

The EU’s gender balance directive represents a pivotal step in addressing gender disparities in corporate leadership. By fostering transparency and accountability, these new rules aim to create more inclusive boardrooms and drive meaningful progress in the years ahead.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

EU Mercosur Agreement Sparks Political Battle Over Cyprus Agriculture

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

January 16, 2026

A political battleground emerged in the Parliamentary Agriculture Committee’s latest session, as fierce debates broke out over the controversial trade deal between the European Union and Latin American nations under the Mercosur framework. Lawmakers voiced deep concerns regarding food safety and the prospects for local agriculture, particularly following the high-profile absence of the Minister of Trade.

Minister Absence And Parliamentary Integrity

Committee Chair Giannakis Gabriel expressed strong disapproval over the Minister’s no-show, noting that the extraordinary session was scheduled at midday at the Minister’s own request. “His absence undermines the authority of the parliament,” Mr. Gabriel declared. Given that the Minister is not abroad, it was expected that he would be present to clarify why Cyprus supported an agreement widely criticized as disadvantaging the agricultural sector.

Trade Deal Under Scrutiny

In his address, A.C.E.L General Secretary Stefanos Stefanos described the pact as a “dangerous agreement” imposed under the pressure of multinational conglomerates. He especially critiqued the contrasting sanitary standards whereby, while the EU bans our farmers from using certain pesticides and antibiotics, the Mercosur deal appears to allow imports produced with these very substances. His remarks underscored the possibility of double standards in safety measures and the potential long-term impacts on Cypriot agriculture.

Economic And Safety Concerns

Legislators questioned the basis of government studies that justified backing the agreement, even as Cyprus’ agricultural sustainability is increasingly threatened by water scarcity and soaring production costs. Representatives from various political factions pointed to insufficient controls over import volumes and tariff structures. For example, Christos Orphanidis (DIKO) demanded precise data on imports from Latin America, citing honey as a case in point, and pressed for clear explanations regarding the tariff regime.

Legal And Health Implications

Questions about legal authority were raised by Elias Myriantounos (EDEK), who inquired whether parliament can reject or amend the agreement should economic studies forecast negative outcomes. Environmental advocates, like Haralambos Theopemptou of the Movement of Ecologists, emphasized the need to safeguard traditional products such as halloumi, highlighting concerns over how rigorous food safety controls will be maintained. Meanwhile, Linos Papagiannis (ELAM) cautioned against unfair competition, drawing parallels with challenges posed by lower-standard goods from occupied territories.

Protecting Local Interests

The overarching message from lawmakers was clear: the future of Cyprus’ farming community and the well-being of its citizens should not be sacrificed at the altar of commercial trade. Agricultural organizations have voiced alarm over the importation of goods potentially contaminated with banned substances, the risk of market distortion by low-quality products, and the lack of localized impact studies. They argue that the agreement is biased in favor of select corporate interests, ultimately undermining consumer safety and the livelihood of European farmers.

As this debate continues to unfold, the outcome of these deliberations will be pivotal in determining not only trade policy but also the long-term economic and food security landscape of Cyprus.