Breaking news

Bank Of Cyprus Reshapes Board Committees To Strengthen Governance

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 22, 2025

On Monday, September 22, 2025, Bank of Cyprus Holdings Public Limited Company and Bank of Cyprus Public Company Limited announced a strategic overhaul of their board committees aimed at bolstering governance and risk management frameworks. The bank’s proactive approach highlights its commitment to maintaining an agile and robust leadership structure in today’s dynamic financial landscape.

Risk Committee Reorganization

The newly configured risk committee will be led by Monique Hemerijck, who now assumes the role of chair. The committee’s expanded team includes Stuart Birrell, Christian Hansmeyer, and Andreas Kritiotis. This restructure underscores the bank’s focus on refining risk oversight and ensuring a balanced approach to risk-taking and regulatory compliance.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Audit Committee Leadership

In a parallel move, Irene Psalti has been appointed as the chair of the audit committee. Joining her are Adrian John Lewis, Lyn Grobler, Monique Hemerijck, and Georgios Syrichas. This revamped team is tasked with enhancing audit processes and reinforcing internal controls, thereby driving stronger financial integrity throughout the organization.

Nominations And Corporate Governance Committee

Takis Arapoglou will now chair the nominations and corporate governance committee, supported by Lyn Grobler, Christian Hansmeyer, and Georgios Syrichas. The committee’s reorganization is expected to elevate the bank’s strategic oversight and governance standards, aligning its practices with industry best practices.

Human Resources And Remuneration Committee

Adrian John Lewis has been designated as the chair of the human resources and remuneration committee, with Stuart Birrell, Irene Psalti, and Andreas Kritiotis completing the team. This restructuring is integral to enhancing the bank’s internal talent management and aligning executive remuneration with performance metrics.

Stability In Technology Governance

The bank confirmed that the composition of the technology committee remains unchanged. Lyn Grobler will continue as chair, with Monique Hemerijck and Adrian John Lewis serving as members. This stability is crucial as the bank continues to prioritize technological innovation and digital transformation initiatives.

The board’s decision, which takes effect on Wednesday, October 1, 2025, reflects a comprehensive effort to strengthen governance frameworks and position the organization for future challenges. With these expert-led committees in place, Bank of Cyprus reaffirms its dedication to effective oversight and strategic evolution in the fast-paced banking sector.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.