Breaking news

Bank Of Cyprus Delivers Resilient Performance With €509 Million Revenue In H1 2025

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

August 5, 2025

Strong Financial Metrics Amid Challenging Conditions

The Bank Of Cyprus has announced its H1 2025 financial results, reporting total revenue of €509 million despite a 7 percent year‐on‐year decline—primarily due to a contraction in net interest income. The institution posted post-tax profits of €235 million during this period, with Q2 maintaining a consistent performance at €118 million, reflecting stability in a fluctuating market.

Solid Capital Structure and Liquidity

Exceeding its strategic targets, the bank achieved a Return on Tangible Equity (ROTE) of 18.4 percent, well above its set objectives for 2025. Enhanced by a strong Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of 20.6 percent and an overall capital adequacy ratio of 25.8 percent, the bank’s robust balance sheet is underscored by total equity (excluding minority interests) of €2.79 billion as of June 30, 2025.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Robust Growth in Lending and Customer Deposits

A notable highlight this period was the 31 percent year‐on‐year increase in new lending, which rose to €1.6 billion driven by demand for business and international operations loans. The serviced loan portfolio expanded by 5 percent to €10.66 billion, while the retail-dominated deposit base grew by 6 percent, reaching €20.9 billion. With individual customer deposits accounting for the majority of assets and liabilities, the bank continues to fortify its market position.

Operational Efficiency and Strategic Initiatives

The bank maintained a disciplined cost-to-income ratio of 36 percent, despite an increase in overall expenses—attributable to heightened staffing and operating costs. These strategic initiatives, including an anticipated 4 percent increase in the serviced loan portfolio, reflect the bank’s proactive efforts to adapt operationally and remain competitive in a dynamic financial landscape.

Stress Test Success and Forward-Looking Confidence

CEO Panicos Nicolaou highlighted that the bank’s resilient business model, strong organic capital generation, and improved liquidity underpin its sustained performance. The favorable results from the 2025 Single Supervisory Mechanism Stress Test—which placed the bank in the top category based on maximum CET1 reduction—further attest to its competitive edge relative to peers.

Positive Outlook Amid a Robust Economic Backdrop

Nicolaou also noted that the domestic economy continues to experience robust growth, with Cyprus forecast to reach a 3 percent growth rate in 2025—significantly outperforming the Eurozone’s 0.9 percent expectation. The bank’s strategic outlook, coupled with a strong balance sheet and expanded lending portfolio, provides a solid foundation for enduring success amid ongoing global economic uncertainty.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.