Breaking news

Bank Of Cyprus Approves 2025 Results With €3 Billion Lending And €481 Million Profit

Robust Growth And Strategic Initiatives

Bank of Cyprus said its board approved the annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 2025, including audited consolidated results for the group. The report covers Bank of Cyprus Holdings Public Limited Company, Bank of Cyprus Public Company Limited, and subsidiaries. The document is available through the bank’s investor relations platform.

Impressive Lending Volume And Financial Performance

New lending reached €3 billion, up 23% year on year. Gross performing loans increased to €10.9 billion, rising 8%. Retail deposits grew to €22.2 billion, also up 8%. Profit after tax totaled €481 million, including €128 million in the fourth quarter. Return on tangible equity stood at 18.6%, while basic earnings per share reached €1.10.

Operational Efficiency And Resilience

Cost to income ratio was 37%, reflecting operating efficiency. Non-performing exposure ratio stood at 1.2%, while cost of risk was 33 basis points. Liquidity coverage ratio reached 321%, supported by surplus liquidity of €9.2 billion.

Enhanced Capital And Stress Test Performance

Common equity tier 1 ratio stood at 21.0%, while total capital ratio reached 25.9% as of December 31, 2025. Capital levels were supported by profitability despite distributions and business growth. The bank participated in the 2025 European Central Bank supervisory stress test and reported results above the average of participating institutions. Regulatory buffers are set to increase, with the countercyclical buffer rising from about 0.90% to 1.50% and the systemically important institution buffer from 1.9375% to 2.25% starting January 2026.

Shareholder Value And Dividend Policy

The bank targets a payout ratio between 50% and 70%. Total distribution for 2025 reached €305 million, equal to 70% of adjusted recurring profitability. This includes a cash dividend of €0.70 per share. An interim dividend of €0.20 per share was paid in October 2025. A final dividend of €0.50 per share is proposed for approval at the annual general meeting on May 15, 2026, compared with €0.48 per share in 2024. A share buyback programme resulted in the cancellation of more than 5.1 million shares at an average price of €5.83.

Strategic Acquisitions And Future Outlook

Recent developments include a minority investment in Wealthyhood and the acquisition of a performing loan portfolio and deposits from Cyprus Development Bank Public Company Limited. These transactions expand the bank’s portfolio alongside existing liquidity and capital levels.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter