Breaking news

Apple to Pay Nearly $100 Million to Settle Siri Privacy Lawsuit

Apple has agreed to pay $95 million to resolve a class-action lawsuit accusing its Siri voice assistant of violating users’ privacy by illegally recording private conversations and sharing the information with advertisers. The settlement, filed in a federal court in Oakland, California, marks a significant case in the ongoing debate over data privacy and corporate responsibility.

Key Allegations Against Apple

The lawsuit alleges that Siri was inadvertently activated on Apple devices, including iPhones and Apple Watches, leading to private conversations being recorded without user consent. These recordings, according to the plaintiffs, were shared with third parties, including advertisers.

Some plaintiffs reported receiving targeted ads for products shortly after discussing them in private, fuelling suspicions about how their data was being used.

Apple denies the claims, maintaining that it does not intentionally eavesdrop on users or share their conversations with advertisers. Nevertheless, the company chose to settle the case to avoid prolonged litigation.

Settlement Details

  • Apple has agreed to pay $95 million in cash to affected users as part of the settlement.
  • Individuals included in the class action could receive up to $20 per eligible device.
  • Devices covered include iPhones, Apple Watches, and other products with Siri functionality.

The preliminary settlement was filed on Tuesday and awaits approval from U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White.

The Big Number

Apple’s market capitalization, standing at $93.74 billion, highlights the scale of its financial resources. Analysts estimate it will take Apple just nine hours of market activity to recoup the settlement amount.

Wider Implications for Big Tech

This lawsuit is part of a broader trend of legal actions against major tech companies for alleged privacy violations. Google’s parent company Alphabet is facing a similar lawsuit, with plaintiffs accusing its Voice Assistant of eavesdropping on private conversations. That case is being heard in a federal court in San Jose, California, the same district as the Apple lawsuit.

Both lawsuits are being handled by the same law firms, underscoring a growing legal focus on protecting user privacy and holding tech companies accountable.

What’s Next?

The Apple settlement sheds light on how tech giants handle sensitive user data and raises questions about the safeguards in place to protect privacy. As legal scrutiny intensifies, companies like Apple and Google may face increasing pressure to enhance transparency and security measures, setting a new standard for user privacy in the digital age.

The settlement also serves as a reminder for users to remain vigilant about the privacy settings on their devices and to hold corporations accountable for upholding their commitments to data protection.

Cloudflare Sets New Default To Separate Search Crawlers From AI Bots

Cloudflare has drawn a sharper line between traditional search and artificial intelligence.

Beginning September 15, 2026, the company will change its default settings to block so-called mixed-use crawlers from pages that run ads, unless a site owner chooses otherwise. The policy applies to new Cloudflare customers, new sites created by existing customers, and all current free customers.

A Clearer Divide In Web Access

The shift could materially reshape how AI companies collect web data for model training and agentic products. Cloudflare’s central argument is straightforward: most publishers want their content to remain visible in search and accessible through certain AI services, but they do not want that same material repurposed without compensation.

In Cloudflare’s view, the problem is not crawling itself. It is the blending of three different functions: search, agentic use, and training into a single bot that makes it difficult for website owners to set meaningful boundaries.

The Google Question

Cloudflare pointedly referenced the “world’s largest search engine,” an unmistakable nod to Google, arguing that it has access to roughly twice as much information as rival AI companies because it makes it harder for customers to stay discoverable without also being used for AI.

Google has disputed that framing. The company offers Google Extended, a crawler setting that lets publishers opt out of having content used for training and AI products such as Gemini apps and Vertex AI, without affecting visibility in Google Search. At the same time, Googlebot still crawls for Search and for AI-powered features such as AI Overviews and AI Mode.

Publishers Want Reach, Not Exploitation

Matthew Prince, Cloudflare’s co-founder and chief executive, said the company is moving quickly because the internet is now dominated by machine traffic.

“Now that the majority of traffic on the Internet is non-human, we must go further and act faster so that a sustainable ecosystem can emerge,” Prince said, referring to the recent milestone in which bots surpassed human traffic online sooner than expected.

Prince added that Cloudflare’s tools and partnerships are designed to give publishers more visibility and commercial leverage, while also rewarding AI companies that are transparent about how they use content.

From Pay Per Crawl To Pay Per Use

Cloudflare has increasingly positioned itself as a gatekeeper for publishers looking to assert control in the AI era. The company already offers tools to block AI bots, along with a marketplace called Pay Per Crawl, which lets websites charge AI systems for scraping.

That framework is now expanding into Pay Per Use, which Cloudflare says will allow publishers to charge AI companies when content creates value, not merely when it is fetched. In practical terms, that shifts the economics from extraction to monetization.

Cloudflare says the move may also reduce waste. Its data suggests more than half of crawl traffic from AI bots is spent revisiting pages that have not changed, consuming bandwidth and compute without adding fresh value for either side.

Early Partners Signal The Commercial Model

To launch the new system, Cloudflare is working with Ceramic.ai and You.com. Under the opt-in model, publishers can be paid when their content appears in Ceramic’s AI search results or when You.com accesses premium material.

Cloudflare says other AI companies can adapt the model to fit their own products. The broader message is clear: the era of unrestricted crawling is giving way to one in which access, attribution, and compensation are increasingly negotiated rather than assumed.

eCredo
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter