Breaking news

Apple Cuts Fees In China As IPhone Sales Rise And Revenue Grows

Strategic Engagement In China

Apple Inc. CEO Tim Cook visited Chengdu as part of the company’s 50th anniversary activities, highlighting continued focus on the Chinese market. Visit comes amid ongoing U.S.-China tensions and regulatory pressure on foreign technology companies.

Regulatory Concessions And Market Adaptation

Apple reduced App Store commissions in China following discussions with regulators. Fees for in-app purchases and paid transactions declined from 30% to 25% starting March 15. Charges for smaller developers and mini-app partners were reduced from 15% to 12%. Changes reflect adjustments to local regulatory requirements and efforts to maintain market access.

Robust Sales Performance Amid Rising Competition

Apple reported growth in China despite increased competition. Data from Counterpoint Research shows iPhone sales increased by 23% in the first nine weeks of 2026, while the broader Chinese smartphone market declined by 4%.

Revenue from the Greater China segment increased by 38% to $25.5 billion, supported by demand for iPhone 17. Apple continues to compete with manufacturers, including Oppo and Vivo.

Implications For Wall Street And The AI Frontier

Performance in China remains important for investor expectations as Apple expands its focus on artificial intelligence. The company has not yet released a flagship AI product.

Leadership changes include the departure of former AI head John Giannandrea and the appointment of Amar Subramanya, who previously held roles at Google and Microsoft. Apple also generates revenue from App Store fees linked to AI applications, including ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, and Gemini.

Conclusion

As Apple nears its 50th anniversary, its measured approach in China encapsulates a broader narrative of strategic resilience and market acumen. By deftly balancing regulatory concessions with aggressive sales tactics and pioneering investments in AI, Apple is positioning itself not only to sustain its leadership in key markets but also to drive future growth amid a complex global landscape.

Meta’s $18 Billion Settlement Limits State Claims Over Children’s Data

Meta’s $18 billion settlement with attorneys general from 29 U.S. states includes a provision limiting future state claims over the company’s use of children’s data for age-assurance systems.

Under the agreement, Meta must develop, train and begin testing a system to identify users under 13 within a year of the settlement taking effect. The company already uses AI-based age-detection tools, although the agreement does not require the new system to use AI.

States Agree To Limits On Future Claims

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) generally restricts the collection and retention of personal data from children under 13. Under the settlement, the 29 state attorneys general agreed not to bring past, present or future claims under COPPA or similar state laws over the specified use of children’s data.

Meta will not be permitted to use information from users under 13 for advertising, marketing or algorithmic optimisation.

Federal Enforcement Remains Unclear

COPPA is primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which is not a party to the agreement. That leaves open the possibility of separate federal action over how Meta collects or uses children’s data.

Another issue is whether Meta can keep age-assurance data isolated from its other systems. An independent auditor will monitor compliance, but the settlement does not fully specify what data Meta can retain for training, how long it can be stored or whether derived insights can be used elsewhere.

Legal Risks Remain

Joshua Wurtzel, a partner at Schlam Stone & Dolan, said states could still pursue claims if Meta uses the data outside the settlement’s limits. Such cases could depend on how those limits are interpreted.

Peter Jackson, a data and intellectual property attorney at Greenberg Glusker, said the provision could “disincentivize future enforcement actions.”

The agreement gives Meta greater legal certainty around using children’s data for age assurance, but questions remain over federal enforcement, data retention and secondary use.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter