Overview Of The Investigation

The Anticorruption Authority has affirmed Attorney-General George Savvides’ stance that he never received three corruption cases in relation to the alleged irregularities at the Vasiliko LNG import terminal. While an investigation into three complaints yielded no evidence of corruption, it did identify a breach of legal obligations for witnesses summoned to testify, prompting the authority to recommend criminal prosecution against the responsible party.

Dispute Over Prosecutorial Measures

Despite the authority’s urging, Savvides maintained that initiating a criminal prosecution was not feasible, primarily because the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) had already launched its own probe into the matter. This overlap of jurisdiction effectively limited national efforts and, with the disagreement formally recorded, the matter has now been closed at the domestic level.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Wider Regulatory And Financial Implications

This incident unfolds amidst a broader EPPO investigation launched last year, which scrutinizes suspicions including procurement fraud and alleged misuse of EU funds linked to the LNG project. Further intensifying the issue, recent actions involved a detailed examination of bank accounts belonging to political figures, current and former state officials, and civil servants. Such measures highlight the complexities inherent in cross-border legal coordination at high-stakes infrastructure projects.

European Oversight And Project Challenges

In parallel, the European Commission recently demanded that Cyprus repay nearly €69 million in LNG grants, citing procedural irregularities during the tender process and subsequent contract arrangements with the CPP-Metron Consortium. The stalled project, further complicated by reported disputes over delayed and insufficient payments, underscores the intense scrutiny of both regulatory compliance and execution in major public contracts.

Conclusion

The legal and regulatory dimensions of the Vasiliko LNG project underscore significant challenges in aligning domestic and supranational oversight. As national authorities grapple with the limitations imposed by external investigations, the case serves as a critical reminder of the intricate balance between enforcing local legal frameworks and accommodating broader European judicial processes in high-profile infrastructure endeavors.