Breaking news

Anthropic CEO’s Pentagon Talks Expose Divide Over AI In Warfare

Renewed Talks Under High Stakes

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has resumed negotiations with the U.S. Department of Defense after earlier discussions over the military use of the company’s AI tools collapsed. Renewed talks follow last Friday’s breakdown in high-level negotiations concerning rules governing access to Anthropic’s Claude models.

Contentious Negotiation Dynamics

Sources cited by the Financial Times indicate that Amodei is now holding discussions with Emil Michael, the Pentagon’s under secretary for research and engineering, in an attempt to reach a compromise. Disagreement centers on Anthropic’s restrictions on how its AI systems may analyze large volumes of acquired data, a limitation that conflicts with Defense Department requirements.

Political And Strategic Pressures

Tensions escalated after the collapse of previous negotiations. Former President Donald Trump reportedly instructed federal agencies to suspend the use of Anthropic’s tools, while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that the company could be designated a national security supply-chain risk. Public criticism intensified when Michael sharply criticized Amodei in a post on X, amplifying debate around the company’s stance on military AI applications.

Implications For AI Deployment

Negotiations carry implications beyond the immediate dispute. Anthropic’s Claude became the first major AI model deployed within classified Pentagon networks under a contract reportedly worth $200 million. At the same time, Anthropic has sought guarantees that its technology will not be used for domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons systems. A separate agreement between the Defense Department and OpenAI has also drawn attention, with CEO Sam Altman advocating for equal conditions for AI providers working with government agencies.

Industry Debate Over Military AI

Discussions reflect broader divisions across the technology sector regarding AI’s role in national security. Founded in 2021 by former OpenAI researchers, Anthropic has positioned itself as a company prioritizing AI safety and responsible deployment. That approach has attracted support among some researchers but also criticism from policymakers who argue that restrictions could slow the adoption of advanced AI tools within defense institutions.

Outlook For The Sector

Technology companies, defense officials, and investors are closely watching the negotiations. The outcome could shape how advanced AI systems are integrated into military operations and determine the balance between safety considerations and strategic technological advantage in the rapidly evolving AI sector.

Passkeys Are The Gold Standard For Account Security. So Why Don’t More Major Apps Offer Them?

Passkeys are increasingly being promoted as one of the most effective ways to protect online accounts. By reducing reliance on passwords, they help prevent phishing attacks, simplify sign-ins and strengthen account security. Despite those advantages, however, many major digital platforms have yet to adopt the technology.

A Security Upgrade Still Missing At Scale

That gap is the focus of whynopasskeys.com, a new site created by security researcher Scott Helme to highlight companies that have not yet enabled passkeys for their users. The site tracks major consumer brands that continue to rely on older login methods even as passkeys become the industry standard.

Among the services still without passkey support are Instagram, Netflix and Spotify, according to the site’s data.

Why Passkeys Matter

Unlike traditional passwords, passkeys are generated on a user’s device and linked both to that device and to a specific website or application. Authentication can be completed through biometrics such as Face ID or Touch ID, a hardware security key or a password manager.

Because users do not need to create or remember passwords, opportunities for credential theft, phishing attacks and password reuse are significantly reduced. In most cases, gaining access to an account would require direct access to the user’s device.

Public Accountability As A Pressure Tactic

In a blog post explaining the project, Helme said the goal is to create pressure by making the absence of passkey support visible. “A list is a surprisingly effective motivator. Nobody wants to be on the list,” he wrote.

That approach has already worked elsewhere in cybersecurity: when businesses are publicly compared against peers on basic protections, they often move faster to close the gap. In this case, the list is intended to push platforms to give users a stronger and simpler login option.

The Companies Moving Faster

Many large technology companies have already adopted passkeys, including Apple, Google and Microsoft, reflecting the technology’s growing role in account security.

Implementation, however, remains uneven. Instagram users can currently access passkeys only when their account is linked to a Facebook account that already has passkey support enabled, highlighting differences in adoption even within the same company.

The Bigger Business Question

Meta has not publicly explained why passkeys are available on some of its platforms, including Facebook and WhatsApp, but not fully across Instagram.

Debate within the industry is no longer centred on whether passkeys work, but on how quickly companies are willing to deploy them. As phishing, credential theft and account fraud remain persistent cybersecurity challenges, passkeys are increasingly being viewed not as an optional feature but as an emerging security standard.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter