Breaking news

Allwyn International AG and OPAP S.A. Formally Approve Merger

Strategic Merger Paves The Way For Global Dominance

Allwyn International AG and OPAP S.A. have formally approved a merger via an all-share transaction valued at €16 billion. This strategic alliance positions the combined entity as the world’s second-largest listed lottery and gaming operator, reinforcing its global stature while remaining listed on the Athens Stock Exchange.

A New Chapter In Market Leadership

The forthcoming company, set to be renamed Allwyn, is expected to rank among the largest by market capitalisation. In addition to its steadfast presence in Athens, the entity plans an additional listing on a major international exchange, such as London or New York, to further broaden investor access and market reach.

Historical Partnership and Growth Trajectory

This merger builds on a successful collaboration that began in 2013, when KKCG, Allwyn’s controlling shareholder, first invested in OPAP. Allwyn’s current stake of 51.78 percent in OPAP underscores the deep-rooted synergy between the companies. With a robust track record of both organic and inorganic growth, Allwyn has effectively navigated market expansions through strategic and bolt-on acquisitions.

Enhanced Financial Fundamentals And Technological Edge

The integration is expected to deliver a pro forma EBITDA of €1.9 billion for the 12 months ending June 30, 2025, positioning the merged company as the largest listed lottery operator globally. With projected double-digit EBITDA growth between 2024 and 2026, the transaction promises significant accretion to OPAP’s earnings per share and free cash flow per share. Moreover, with proprietary technologies, content, and AI capabilities, the combined entity is set to drive faster innovation and reduce reliance on third parties.

Transaction Mechanics And Future Outlook

Under the new structure, OPAP will transfer its business into newly created Greek subsidiaries and adjust its statutory seat to Luxembourg through the formation of LuxCo. Subsequent re-domiciliation to Switzerland will align with Allwyn’s headquarters. The merger not only fortifies market diversification but also lays the foundation for resilient shareholder returns under a strategic capital allocation framework that balances growth investments with stable dividends.

Board Leadership And Strategic Vision

With leadership continuity—Robert Chvatal as CEO and Kenneth Morton as CFO—the combined board, chaired by Karel Komarek, will comprise a blend of seasoned executives from both companies. This merger is designed to accelerate innovation and global expansion, reflecting a unified strategy to capitalize on market opportunities and sculpt the future of gaming entertainment.

Conclusion

For investors and industry observers alike, this merger represents a pivotal development in the gaming landscape. The combined company not only strengthens its global footprint but also leverages superior technological capabilities and robust financial metrics to remain at the forefront of a rapidly evolving sector.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter