Breaking news

DOJ’s Bold Move: Breaking Up Google’s Digital Ad Monopoly

In a landmark initiative, the U.S. Department of Justice is pushing for Google to split off key segments of its digital advertising business. The DOJ contends that the tech behemoth is unlawfully monopolizing the ad tech arena, a claim supported by last month’s federal court decision.

The Justice Department aims to expedite the sale of Ad Exchange, a pivotal platform matching advertisers with publishers. Furthermore, they are calling for the gradual divestiture of Google’s DFP ad server, a tool integral for digital ad management. This process, to be overseen by a court official, will grant the DOJ veto power over potential buyers.

Google

Judge Leonie Brinkema has scheduled a trial for September 22 to finalize the corrective strategies, following the court’s recognition of Google’s adverse effects on consumer markets. Notably, the DOJ has unveiled additional measures, urging Google to integrate third-party tools into its system to maintain bidding fairness.

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, which drew nearly $350 billion in 2024, primarily from ads, is expected to fiercely contest these directives. Their leadership argues that the suggested divestitures, particularly in the ad management sector, exceed the judge’s ruling scope. They also claim that such enforced sales may not align with legal allowances.

Despite these pushbacks, speculation about how innovative strategies might reshape market dynamics is rampant. Meanwhile, Google opposes the measures, advocating instead for sharing advertising data with rivals to enhance competitive practices.

The tech giant also faces scrutiny in another antitrust case related to its search monopoly, leading the DOJ to propose the divestment of Google’s Chrome browser. This separate case, judged by Amit Mehta, is predicted to reach a decision by August, possibly heralding a historic change for Google.

A New Twitter-Inspired Social Network Is Taking Shape

A new social network called Twitter.now is entering the market, with a founding team that includes former Twitter trademark counsel Stephen Coates. The service is being developed by startup Operation Bluebird.

As Ars Technica reported, X sued the company last year and asked a Delaware judge to block the launch. Operation Bluebird argued in a petition that X had abandoned trademarks including “Twitter” and “Tweet.”

Coates has said the project is not an attempt to recreate the original Twitter. In a LinkedIn post, he described the platform as a new public space focused on trust, transparency and user choice.

AI System To Rate Posts

Twitter.now is currently being tested, with early access priced at $20. Its main feature is VERA, an AI system designed to evaluate posts, verify claims and provide sources and context.

Posts receive a trust score, with users eventually able to set a minimum score to filter their feeds. The company says this approach will give people more control over what they see instead of leaving those decisions entirely to an algorithm.

Moderation Remains A Challenge

Scaling moderation will be one of the platform’s biggest tests. Social networks have repeatedly struggled with content moderation as their communities grow, and newer platforms such as Bluesky have faced similar criticism.

Operation Bluebird says VERA will form the basis of its moderation and verification system. A second version is already planned, with expanded tools that would let users set a specific trust threshold for the posts appearing in their feeds.

For now, Twitter.now remains in an early testing phase, combining the familiarity of the Twitter name with an AI-driven approach to evaluating online information.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter