Breaking news

Victoria’s Secret Dials Back DEI, Joining Growing Corporate Pushback Against Diversity Programs

In a shift that reflects a broader trend among major corporations, Victoria’s Secret is rebranding its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to focus on “inclusion and belonging,” according to a company memo obtained by Forbes. This move, aligning with recent political winds, marks the lingerie giant’s response to increasing pressure from conservative forces, including President Donald Trump’s efforts to dismantle DEI measures across the corporate landscape.

The Shift In Focus: A Changing Corporate Climate

As of March 5, Victoria’s Secret is also reconsidering its supplier diversity goals, while halting its previously committed targets for promoting Black employees. These changes are part of a broader reevaluation coming after the company’s intense focus on DEI through the 2020s. This era of investment followed a workplace harassment scandal and a public backlash over its lack of body diversity in advertising.

The move reflects a wider corporate rethinking, with companies reassessing the role of DEI programs in light of the shifting political environment. Trump’s stance has made it a key issue in his second presidential run, influencing major businesses to reconsider their DEI commitments.

A March Of Corporate Retreats

Victoria’s Secret is far from alone in re-evaluating its DEI initiatives. In February, a string of companies, from financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and State Street to entertainment giants such as Warner Bros. Discovery, made similar moves. These companies, once at the forefront of corporate social responsibility, are now scaling back or rebranding their DEI efforts.

  • Goldman Sachs removed DEI language from its annual filings, citing legal developments in the U.S.
  • Warner Bros. Discovery renamed its DEI programs to just “inclusion” and halted participation in external diversity surveys.
  • State Street, known for its “Fearless Girl” statue, dropped its diversity goals for board representation, aligning with global protocols and local laws.

These are just a few examples of how the political and legal landscape is forcing a reevaluation of corporate DEI efforts.

A Polarized Debate: Businesses Under Pressure

Some companies, like Apple, are attempting to strike a balance, acknowledging the changing legal environment while reaffirming their commitment to diversity. Apple shareholders recently rejected a proposal to eliminate DEI initiatives, but CEO Tim Cook noted that adjustments may be necessary to align with evolving laws.

Meanwhile, Costco and Delta Airlines have firmly rejected calls to abandon DEI, with Costco’s shareholders overwhelmingly voting to continue the company’s commitment to inclusion. Delta’s executive vice president emphasized that diversity remains integral to their business strategy.

The Legal And Political Pushback

Much of this corporate retraction is driven by external pressure from conservative factions, particularly following Trump’s executive orders aimed at curtailing DEI initiatives in federal agencies and private companies with government contracts.

The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has led efforts to curb what it calls “dangerous” DEI programs, signaling that the landscape could shift further if more businesses respond to political and legal pressures. This has led to increased scrutiny of companies that continue to maintain robust DEI frameworks, with some industry giants facing backlash for their commitment to diversity goals.

Will Corporate America Return To DEI?

While some companies are halting DEI goals, many others are doubling down, insisting that diversity remains a crucial element of business success. Companies like Deutsche Bank, Cisco, and the NFL are vocal about the ongoing business value of diversity, and Coca-Cola has even warned that abandoning DEI could harm business performance. The question remains whether the tide will fully turn in favor of a post-DEI corporate world or if those businesses that remain committed to diversity will prove that these programs aren’t just a passing trend.

As this debate unfolds, one thing is clear: corporate America is at a crossroads, and the outcome will likely shape the future of DEI programs in the years to come.

Cyprus Emerges As A Leading Household Consumer In The European Union

Overview Of Eurostat Findings

A recent Eurostat survey, which adjusts real consumption per capita using purchasing power standards (PPS), has positioned Cyprus among the highest household consumers in the European Union. In 2024, Cyprus recorded a per capita expenditure of 21,879 PPS, a figure that underscores the country’s robust material well-being relative to other member states.

Comparative Consumption Analysis

Luxembourg claimed the top spot with an impressive 28,731 PPS per inhabitant. Trailing closely were Ireland (23,534 PPS), Belgium (23,437 PPS), Germany (23,333 PPS), Austria (23,094 PPS), the Netherlands (22,805 PPS), Denmark (22,078 PPS), and Italy (21,986 PPS), with Cyprus rounding out this elite group at 21,879 PPS. These figures not only highlight the high expenditure across these nations but also reflect differences in purchasing power and living standards across the region.

Contrasting Trends In Household Spending

The survey also shed light on countries with lower household spending levels. Hungary and Bulgaria reported the smallest average expenditures, at 14,621 PPS and 15,025 PPS respectively. Meanwhile, Greece and Portugal recorded 18,752 PPS and 19,328 PPS, respectively. Noteworthy figures from France (20,462 PPS), Finland (20,158 PPS), Lithuania (19,261 PPS), Malta (19,622 PPS), Slovenia (18,269 PPS), Slovakia (17,233 PPS), Latvia (16,461 PPS), Estonia (16,209 PPS), and the Czech Republic (16,757 PPS) further illustrate the disparate economic landscapes within the EU. Spain’s figure, however, was an outlier at 10,899 PPS, suggesting the need for further data clarification.

Growth Trends And Economic Implications

Eurostat’s longitudinal analysis from 2019 to 2024 revealed that Croatia, Bulgaria, and Romania experienced the fastest annual increases in real consumer spending, each growing by at least 3.8%. In contrast, five member states, with the Czech Republic experiencing the largest drop at an average annual decline of 1.3%, indicate a varied economic recovery narrative across the continent.

This comprehensive survey not only provides valuable insights into current household consumption patterns but also offers a robust framework for policymakers and business leaders to understand economic shifts across the EU. Such data is integral for strategic decision-making in markets that are increasingly defined by evolving consumer behavior and regional economic resilience.

Uri Levine Course vertical
SWC Finals V
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter