Breaking news

Stagflation-lite: A Subtle Economic Threat That Could Disrupt Global Policy

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 24, 2025

Policymakers might not favor the term “stagflation,” but its modern, milder variant—stagflation-lite—could soon dominate their concerns. With U.S. President Donald Trump threatening import tariffs that risk igniting a global trade war, the stage is set for a scenario where below-trend growth meets above-trend inflation.

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey recently dismissed the term, remarking, “I don’t use the word stagflation. It doesn’t have a particularly, frankly, precise meaning.” Once coined to describe the 1970s mix of economic stagnation and runaway inflation, “stagflation” now often labels any scenario where growth falters while inflation runs hot—even if only moderately so.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Yet, even this diluted form can pose serious challenges. Policymakers’ tools are typically designed either to spur growth or rein in inflation—rarely both simultaneously. As economists warn that tit-for-tat protectionist measures could usher in stagflation-lite, central bankers worldwide might find themselves grappling with an economic conundrum unlike any other.

Across the pond in Britain, data underscores these concerns. Recent figures reveal inflation climbing to 3%—well above the Bank of England’s 2% target—while economic growth shows signs of cooling. Analysts at Morgan Stanley and HSBC have trimmed their 2025 UK GDP growth forecast to 0.9% from 1.4%, and the BoE now projects inflation will peak at 3.7% later this year before subsiding.

The debate extends to Europe as well. At the European Central Bank, contrasting views have emerged: Isabel Schnabel, a noted hawk, is leaning toward pausing rate cuts, while Italian central bank chief Fabio Panetta cautions that growth could be even weaker than anticipated.

As global trade tensions simmer and economic indicators point to a potential stagflation-lite environment, the challenge for policymakers is clear. Balancing the dual mandates of sustaining growth and controlling inflation will require unprecedented finesse—a balancing act that, if mismanaged, could have far-reaching implications for the global economy.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

What Cyprus Can Learn From Greece And Malta’s Growth Strategies

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

July 27, 2026

Across the Mediterranean, countries are increasingly competing not only for tourists but also for long-term residents, investment and skilled professionals. Greece and Malta have adopted different strategies to achieve that goal, offering two models that may hold lessons for Cyprus.

The shift comes as the traditional tourism model faces growing pressure. Climate change, overtourism and the rise of remote work have exposed the limitations of economies that depend heavily on peak summer demand. Increasingly, Mediterranean countries are looking for ways to extend tourism activity into year-round economic growth.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Greece Stopped Selling Only The Summer

Greece offers one of the clearest examples of that transition. While its islands have long depended on July and August tourism, many have spent the past decade extending the season through infrastructure investment. Fibre connectivity has expanded to islands that once struggled with unreliable service, while ports have been upgraded with European recovery funding. On islands such as Naxos and Paros, the tourism season now stretches from Easter through November.

A longer season is also attracting more long-term visitors considering relocation rather than short holidays. Unlike tourists who leave after a week, residents contribute to the local economy throughout the year through housing, banking, education and everyday spending.

Athens has adjusted its policy framework accordingly. In 2024, it revised its residency-linked property investment rules, raising the investment threshold to €800,000 in high-demand areas including central Athens, Mykonos and Santorini, while maintaining a €400,000 threshold elsewhere. The objective was to redirect foreign investment toward regions with greater capacity while easing pressure on the country’s hottest property markets.

The policy has attracted attention for attempting to balance investment with concerns over housing affordability and the long-term sustainability of local communities.

Malta Turned Staying Into A Product

Malta has pursued a different strategy. Without Greece’s size or tourism volumes, it focused on attracting internationally mobile industries including financial services, iGaming and maritime registration. Competitive regulation and targeted policies helped establish the country as a base for those sectors.

The result has been a service-driven economy and one of the fastest-growing populations in the European Union, supported largely by international workers.

Alongside employment-based pathways, Malta also offers a residence programme for non-EU nationals combining a government contribution, a property purchase or long-term lease, and a philanthropic donation. Lower property thresholds in southern Malta and Gozo are intended to steer investment towards less-developed areas.

Whatever the broader debate surrounding such schemes, the policy reflects a consistent objective: converting foreign interest into long-term economic participation.

The Risks Of Success

Neither approach is without trade-offs. In Greece, Santorini has become a symbol of overtourism, with cruise arrivals placing increasing pressure on local infrastructure and prompting discussions over visitor limits. Rising demand for short-term rentals has also reduced housing availability for local residents in several destinations.

Malta faces different challenges. Rapid population growth has added pressure to infrastructure and housing, while the country has spent years rebuilding the reputation of its financial services sector following international scrutiny.

Both cases illustrate that attracting investment is only part of the equation. Managing its impact on housing, infrastructure and local communities is equally important.

What Cyprus Can Learn

Taken together, Greece and Malta demonstrate two distinct approaches to long-term economic development.

Greece is seeking to channel investment towards regions that can accommodate growth while reducing pressure on its busiest destinations. Malta has built its strategy around specialised industries, regulatory certainty and structured pathways for long-term residence.

For Cyprus, the lesson is not to replicate either model. Rather, it is to understand the trade-offs behind each approach. As competition for investment and internationally mobile residents intensifies across the Mediterranean, long-term success will depend not only on attracting people and capital, but also on ensuring growth remains sustainable for local communities.