Breaking news

Cyprus Schools Turn Cooking Oil Into Biofuel in Award-Winning ‘Frying Pan’ Initiative

In a move that’s earning Cyprus international praise, schoolchildren are playing a key role in turning used cooking oil into biodiesel. The “Tiganokinisi” or “frying pan” initiative, which has been integrated into the country’s national curriculum since 2018, is revolutionizing the recycling process, one bottle of oil at a time.

With over 80,000 students engaged annually, the project has schools acting as collection hubs for used cooking oil. The oil, sourced from homes across the island, is then filtered and transformed into biodiesel, tackling a global environmental problem: the disposal of millions of liters of cooking oil that often end up clogging drains, contaminating water supplies, and causing landfill fires.

Xenia Loizidou, chair of the AKTI Project and Research Centre, which coordinates the initiative, explained the scale of the challenge: “The logistics are huge to collect this half-litre of cooking oil from each of our houses.” Despite the challenges, the program has already managed to capture about 10% of Cyprus’s annual 2,000-tonne cooking oil waste.

The project has also proven to be an educational goldmine. Students not only contribute to recycling efforts but are also given a say in how the proceeds are spent—funding green initiatives like photovoltaic panels, water fountains, and aromatic gardens in their schools. Over €550,000 has been allocated for these projects since the program’s inception.

In 2021, U.S. energy giant Chevron stepped in to fund the mobile science laboratory that travels to schools across Cyprus, furthering the program’s reach. “We quickly realized this was a great fit for us,” said Kristian Svendsen, Chevron’s regional manager for Egypt and Cyprus. The initiative has now visited over 500 schools, spreading awareness of both recycling and renewable energy.

With its blend of environmental activism, education, and community involvement, “Tiganokinisi” has garnered attention worldwide, winning accolades from the European Commission for social innovation and from the Global Education Network Europe for excellence in global education.

This pioneering initiative shows how Cyprus is stepping up to tackle waste while teaching a generation of students that “waste” can have value—and that value can help power the future.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter