Breaking news

Foreigners Driving Cyprus Property Prices Through The Roof: Bypassing Laws And Raising Concerns

Foreign buyers are sweeping up land across Cyprus, sidestepping local regulations, and pushing property prices to unprecedented levels. Meanwhile, this trend is creating a housing crisis for residents, particularly young couples who are struggling to find affordable homes.

While legislation does exist, including restrictions on foreign ownership, it appears to be easily bypassed. Sources close to the matter suggest that foreigners are increasingly purchasing property via legal entities, such as companies, which allows them to sidestep the scrutiny intended by the law.

The issue has been a topic of public debate for some time, but now it’s taking center stage in a more focused manner, thanks to a new parliamentary push. Today, the parliamentary Interior Committee will discuss a bill introduced by Nikos Georgiou, the DISY MP for Famagusta.

Representatives from the Ministry of Interior, the Department of Land and Surveys, the Ministry of Finance, the Legal Service of the Republic, and the Registrar of Companies and Intellectual Property have all been invited to share their views. They will be tasked with shedding light on the growing issue of foreign buyers bypassing the law by acquiring property through companies and trusts.

Tightening The Legal Framework

Georgiou’s proposed bill aims to modernize Cyprus’ property acquisition laws for foreigners, ensuring more transparency and tightening controls. According to the explanatory memorandum, the aim is to protect public interests by improving the monitoring process, enforcing stricter due diligence, and ensuring professionals like lawyers and accountants adhere to stringent ‘Know Your Client’ (KYC) guidelines.

The proposed law would essentially embed these professionals into the process, ensuring they verify the identity of foreign buyers before any property transactions can go through. This move mimics anti-money laundering practices and aims to close the loopholes that allow foreigners to bypass local controls by using legal entities.

Loopholes For Companies

As citizens and officials raise concerns, the current law (Article 3) already imposes restrictions on foreign individuals purchasing real estate, which requires prior approval from the Council of Ministers. The legislation also sets clear boundaries for the area of land a foreigner can acquire, ensuring it remains within manageable limits for residential or business purposes.

However, as pointed out by Nikos Georgiou in a parliamentary question last summer, there is growing evidence that foreigners are exploiting these laws by buying property through companies. This raises the question: why should restrictions exist for individuals if they can easily circumvent the law through corporate structures?

As legal expert George Koukounis pointed out years ago, any foreigner can establish a Cypriot company to purchase property without facing the same constraints. The problem lies in why natural persons face limitations when they can bypass these through a company.

European Perspective On Foreign Property Ownership

While Cyprus isn’t the only country facing these issues, it does stand out. Across Europe, many countries have taken steps to address similar concerns.

In Finland, a recent report called for stricter legislation to prevent foreigners from acquiring property, especially from countries whose actions threaten national security. In the UK, transparency rules and anti-money laundering measures are in place, ensuring more thorough checks on foreign buyers. Meanwhile, in Greece, foreign purchases are restricted in border regions and require special permits from the Ministry of National Defense.

These measures reflect the growing sense of caution in Europe over foreign ownership of land and property. The increasing concerns in Cyprus may well push for similar reforms, with calls for greater scrutiny of foreign buyers becoming louder by the day.

SEC Drops Lawsuit Against Gemini: A Major Turning Point In Crypto Regulation

SEC Dismisses Legal Action Against Gemini

The Securities and Exchange Commission has formally withdrawn its lawsuit against Gemini, the prominent crypto exchange founded by twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. The move follows a joint court filing in which both the regulator and Gemini sought dismissal of the case that centered on the collapse of the Gemini Earn investment product, a debacle that left investors without access to their funds for 18 months.

Settlement And Regulatory Reassessment

In a significant development, a 2024 settlement between New York and Gemini ensured that investors recovered one hundred percent of their crypto assets loaned through the Gemini Earn program. The legal reprieve comes on the heels of actions initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused Gemini of defrauding investors.

Political Backdrop And Industry Implications

This dismissal reinforces a broader trend of regulatory leniency toward the crypto sector noted during the Trump administration, which saw the SEC dismiss, pause, or reduce penalties in more than 60 percent of its pending crypto lawsuits. Meanwhile, Gemini’s recent public offering filing underscores its ambitions to solidify its status as a major player in the evolving digital asset market.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter