Breaking news

Sweden Steps Up Election Defenses Against AI-Driven Foreign Influence

Sweden is strengthening efforts to detect foreign information influence and coordinated attempts to manipulate political debate ahead of its general election. Authorities are focusing on how artificial intelligence and social media are changing the creation, distribution and amplification of political messages.

The government said greater resilience is needed because of the current security environment, rapid technological developments and lessons from elections elsewhere in Europe.

AI Network Shows How Influence Tactics Are Evolving

The Swedish Psychological Defence Agency last week reported a partly AI-powered network of about 1,200 fake accounts on X known as Holiday. The network generated more than 50,000 posts, comments and shares during 2025 and 2026 and was used for malign influence targeting Sweden and other countries.

Sweden’s central bank first identified the accounts after employees took part in an agency exercise, and X later removed the network. Holiday has not been directly linked to this year’s election, but authorities released the findings ahead of the vote to highlight emerging tactics.

TikTok And AI Change How Voters Get Information

One in 10 Swedes uses AI services to ask questions about politics or social issues, according to an April report from Sweden’s Internet Foundation. Among first-time voters, the share rises to one in four.

Recommendation systems can amplify sensational or emotionally charged content because it generates stronger engagement. Generative AI also allows networks to produce large volumes of material across multiple accounts at relatively low cost.

In February, Swedish public radio identified four TikTok accounts featuring AI-generated young women that promoted far-right and anti-immigration messages. The broadcaster found indications that the accounts were operated by the same actor.

Authorities Monitor Rising Online Activity

A Swedish Psychological Defence Agency poll found that 64% of adults believe foreign attempts to influence Sweden this year are very or quite likely. Meanwhile, the Swedish Defence Research Agency said election-related posts increased from about 1,000 a day to almost 2,400 shortly before early voting began.

Researchers have detected coordinated posting, identical content and fake accounts, but said the scale remains limited. So far, they have not attributed the activity to an organized foreign campaign.

Migration Remains A Key Disinformation Target

Migration-related narratives remain a particular focus because they have featured prominently in Russian disinformation efforts. Researchers have monitored claims that Sweden is being “Islamified,” that migrants were brought in to support left-wing parties and that electoral fraud is taking place.

“When we look at the topics that Russia has been pushing before, this is outgrowing every other topic, even support for Ukraine,” said Ola Svenonius, a senior researcher at the Swedish Defence Research Agency.

Despite these narratives, Sweden is not currently considered a priority target for Russian information influence by the Swedish Psychological Defence Agency. Svenonius said Moscow may instead focus on other elections, including German state contests.

Sweden Builds On Lessons From Earlier Elections

Authorities say Sweden is now better prepared to identify suspicious activity than during previous election cycles. Svenonius, who has monitored the country’s election information environment since 2018, said institutional awareness has also improved.

“We should be concerned,” he said. “We shouldn’t be panicked, but concerned for sure.”

Booking Holdings Loses EU Appeal In €1.63 Billion ETraveli Deal Ruling

Booking Holdings has lost its challenge to the European Union’s veto of its €1.63 billion acquisition of ETraveli, marking a significant victory for regulators and underscoring the bloc’s tougher stance on large-scale tech and platform deals.

European Court Backs Commission’s Merger Analysis

On Wednesday, Europe’s second-highest court sided with the European Commission, which blocked the deal in 2023 on the grounds that it would have deepened Booking’s market power and made it harder for competitors to challenge its position in online travel services.

The Luxembourg-based General Court rejected Booking’s claim that the Commission had failed to follow its own merger rules and had applied the wrong legal test. In its ruling, the court said regulators were correct to conclude that acquiring ETraveli, one of Europe’s leading online flight booking platforms, would have reinforced Booking’s already dominant position in online travel agencies tied to hotel bookings.

Why Regulators Stepped In

The case reflects a broader shift in European competition policy. In recent years, the Commission has intensified scrutiny of acquisitions by dominant technology and platform companies, warning that so-called “killer acquisitions” can weaken competition by absorbing smaller but strategically important rivals before they grow into serious threats.

For regulators, the concern was not simply the size of the transaction, but the strategic logic behind it: combining a major hotel booking platform with a leading flight booking operator could have created a more integrated travel ecosystem that rival firms might struggle to match.

What The Deal Would Have Added To Booking’s Portfolio

Booking’s portfolio includes Booking.com, Rentalcars, Priceline and Agoda, giving it broad reach across global travel services. ETraveli, owned by private equity firm CVC Capital Partners, operates brands such as Gotogate and Mytrip and also provides airline content distribution through TripStack.

The combination would have expanded Booking’s ability to offer a wider set of travel products within a single ecosystem, a model that can strengthen customer retention but also raise concerns about market concentration and competitive foreclosure.

Appeal Still Possible

The General Court’s ruling does not necessarily end the matter. Booking can still appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the bloc’s highest court, if it chooses to continue the legal fight.

For now, however, the decision stands as a reminder that in Europe, even large and established platform companies face increasing resistance when acquisitions appear likely to consolidate power rather than expand consumer choice.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter