Opens in a new tab

Breaking news

Cyprus Bar Association Defends Summer Court Recess

Cyprus’ summer court recess is a “very good” system that serves several purposes, according to Nicosia Bar Association chairman Stefanos Skordis, who said there is no need to change the current arrangement.

The Supreme Court and district courts observe a summer recess from July 10 to September 9. While trials are generally not held during this period, judges can still hear urgent cases and deal with other judicial matters when required.

Recess Allows Courts To Prepare For New Year

Skordis said the summer period should not be viewed simply as a holiday, as judges and lawyers continue working on paperwork, pending matters and preparations for the new judicial year.

He also noted that similar arrangements exist in other countries, with courts limiting hearings or introducing special procedures for urgent cases during the summer.

Procedural deadlines generally exclude the summer recess, apart from the final seven days of the period, unless a court decides otherwise.

Similar Systems Across Europe

Several European countries operate comparable systems. Greece has special summer court divisions from July 1 to September 15, while Spain generally treats August as a non-working month for judicial proceedings, with exceptions for urgent cases. Italy also limits proceedings during August, mainly continuing to hear labour disputes.

Belgian courts generally close from July 1 to August 31, while Ireland, which shares a common-law tradition with Cyprus, limits court sittings during judicial holidays but allows special hearings for urgent matters.

A similar approach is followed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, where proceedings are generally suspended during its judicial holiday from July 16 to August 31, unless urgent circumstances require otherwise.

Retail’s AI Push Faces A Cybersecurity And Regulatory Reality Check

Artificial intelligence is becoming a strategic priority for retailers, with 80% of retail leaders planning to increase investment in the technology, according to EY’s latest CEO Outlook Survey. However, growing concerns over cybersecurity, customer privacy and regulation could complicate adoption across an industry already facing inflation, geopolitical uncertainty and changing consumer expectations.

Confidence In AI Comes With Risks

The survey found that 80% of retail leaders are confident in their ability to expand the responsible use of AI and customer data. Retailers are increasingly applying the technology to demand forecasting, inventory management, customer service and personalised marketing, seeking to improve efficiency and respond more quickly to market changes.

Yet adoption brings new vulnerabilities. EY found that 24% of retail leaders identified cybersecurity and data privacy as a leading business risk for the year ahead. Retailers manage sensitive customer information, payment systems and complex supply chains, making effective security and governance essential as AI becomes more deeply embedded in their operations.

The World Economic Forum’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 highlights the wider challenge: 87% of organisations reported rising cyber risks linked to AI vulnerabilities, while 94% expected malicious AI to have a significant impact on cybersecurity in 2026.

Regulation Will Shape AI Adoption

Regulatory frameworks are also influencing how quickly retailers can expand their use of AI. The European Union’s AI Act, China’s state-led governance model and measures introduced by individual US states are shaping the rules around the technology.

For retailers, compliance is becoming a strategic consideration, particularly for customer-facing applications that use personal data to personalise offers, automate interactions or analyse consumer behaviour. Regulatory missteps could carry significant costs in a sector where customer trust is critical.

EY Outlines Four Possible Futures

EY recommends that retailers plan for multiple outcomes rather than assume the current investment boom will continue uninterrupted. Its analysis draws on a four-scenario framework developed by Jim Dator of the University of Hawaii.

One scenario envisages constrained AI adoption as economic pressures, regulation, cyberattacks, legacy systems and poor data quality limit progress. Retailers in this environment may prioritise lower-risk back-office applications, such as finance, procurement, inventory and logistics, while customer-facing tools face resistance.

A second scenario anticipates continued growth, with sustained investment and widespread adoption. A third envisages deeper economic and social transformation as technology reshapes business operations. The fourth considers systemic breakdown, in which a small number of technology platforms control access to AI models and charge premium prices, potentially making advanced capabilities less accessible even to large retailers.

Governance Will Determine Competitive Advantage

EY’s findings suggest that investment alone will not determine which retailers benefit most from AI. Companies will also need robust cybersecurity, effective governance and strategies that can adapt to different economic, technological and regulatory conditions.

For a sector operating on tight margins, the challenge is to turn AI investment into lasting business value while managing the risks that come with greater dependence on the technology.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter